• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
陈星欣, 何明高, 施文城, 郭力群. 盾构对接段成拱机理及上覆压力计算理论研究[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231228
引用本文: 陈星欣, 何明高, 施文城, 郭力群. 盾构对接段成拱机理及上覆压力计算理论研究[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231228
Research on arch forming mechanism and overburden pressure calculation theory of shield butt section[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231228
Citation: Research on arch forming mechanism and overburden pressure calculation theory of shield butt section[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231228

盾构对接段成拱机理及上覆压力计算理论研究

Research on arch forming mechanism and overburden pressure calculation theory of shield butt section

  • 摘要: 采用“相向掘进、地中对接、弃壳解体”的盾构地中对接法时,确保刀盘拆机后临空面稳定性是确保安全对接的关键。依托某盾构对接工程,通过COMSOL Multiphysics建立数值模型,基于主应力矢量流线偏转和各向应力变化确定盾构地中对接段压力拱的主拱圈范围,并通过考虑大主应力的不完全偏转和内摩擦角的不完全调用开展上覆压力计算公式推导。结果表明:沿隧道轴向的最大主应力偏转程度很小,三维成拱效应并不明显,围岩压力拱主要表现为隧道径向成拱。压力拱外边界位于软硬围岩分界面位置处,内边界位于拱顶0.5m位置处,两侧边界倾斜向上,倾角与垂直面的夹角为5.7°,主拱圈呈现为盆状。对比不完全拱的大主应力实际偏转情况发现圆弧、线性、抛物线形拱迹线均高估了主应力偏转角度,导致侧压力系数偏大,计算上覆土压力时偏于不安全,调用内摩擦角则随着距拱顶距离的减小而增大,通过数值模型计算和理论分析得出在压力拱作用下临空面荷载下降为初始围压的1/3。

     

    Abstract: When the shield tunneling method of "face to face excavation, underground docking, and discard shell and disassemble shield" is adopted, ensuring the stability of the free surface after cutter head disassembly is the key to ensure the safe docking. Based on a shield butt joint project, a numerical model was established through COMSOL Multiphysics, and the range of the main arch circle of the pressure arch in the butt joint section of the shield was determined based on the streamline deflection of the principal stress vector and the change of the stress in every direction. The overlying pressure calculation formula was derived by considering the incomplete deflection of the large principal stress and the incomplete call of the internal friction angle. The results show that the deflection degree of the maximum principal stress along the tunnel axis is small, the three-dimensional arch effect is not obvious, and the pressure arch of surrounding rock is mainly manifested as the radial arch of the tunnel. The outer boundary of the pressure arch is located at the interface between soft and hard surrounding rock, and the inner boundary is located at the position of 0.5m of the arch top. The boundary on both sides is inclined upward, and the Angle between the inclination and the vertical plane is 5.7°. The main arch ring is in the shape of a basin. Comparing the actual deflection of large principal stress of incomplete arch, it is found that the arc, linear and parabolic arch trace overestimated the deflection angle of principal stress, resulting in a large lateral pressure coefficient, and it is unsafe to calculate the overlying earth pressure, while the internal friction angle increases with the decrease of the distance from the arch top. Through numerical model calculation and theoretical analysis, it is concluded that under the action of pressure arch, the load on the free surface drops to 1/3 of the initial confining pressure.

     

/

返回文章
返回