• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
葛春巍, 刘钟, 兰伟, 杨宁晔, 文磊, 周洁. 单向与多层互剪搅拌桩性能模型试验对比研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2024, 46(11): 2420-2428. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230791
引用本文: 葛春巍, 刘钟, 兰伟, 杨宁晔, 文磊, 周洁. 单向与多层互剪搅拌桩性能模型试验对比研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2024, 46(11): 2420-2428. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230791
GE Chunwei, LIU Zhong, LAN Wei, YANG Ningye, WEN Lei, ZHOU Jie. Model tests on performances of DSM and CS-DSM piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(11): 2420-2428. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230791
Citation: GE Chunwei, LIU Zhong, LAN Wei, YANG Ningye, WEN Lei, ZHOU Jie. Model tests on performances of DSM and CS-DSM piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(11): 2420-2428. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230791

单向与多层互剪搅拌桩性能模型试验对比研究

Model tests on performances of DSM and CS-DSM piles

  • 摘要: 利用自研单向与多层互剪搅拌桩模型钻机,对传统DSM桩与新型CS-DSM桩的工艺因素及成桩质量进行了模型试验对比研究,探索了水泥掺量和单位桩长搅拌次数T对两类搅拌桩成桩均匀性与桩身强度的影响。试验结果证实CS-DSM桩的表观均匀性和桩身连续性明显好于DSM桩,在T值相同条件下,两者平均桩身强度比Rs为1.41~6.4,且Rs随着搅拌次数T增加而呈指数趋势降低,24组模型试验结果还揭示出DSM桩与CS-DSM桩在UCS-T之间的本质联系。提出的DSM桩与CS-DSM桩的T值和UCS值的计算方法,可以指导搅拌桩施工参数合理选取以实现桩身设计强度目标。通过DSM工法与CS-DSM工法的试验对比研究获得的两类桩的桩身质量差异性结果,能够为高质量的CS-DSM桩工艺控制原则和质量保障体系提供试验依据。

     

    Abstract: Using the small-scale model rig, a comparative experimental study is conducted to investigate the process control and quality control in the deep soil mixing (DSM) method and contra-rotational shear deep soil mixing (CS-DSM) method. The research emphasis is placed on the effects of cement content, blade rotation number T on the uniformity and unconfined compression strength (UCS) of mixing piles. A notably improved uniformity and continuity of the CS-DSM piles over the DSM piles is confirmed by the test results. The strength ratio Rs ranges from 1.41 to 6.4, and it shows an exponential decrease with the increasing T. Furthermore, the results from 24 model piles provide insights into the fundamental relationship and distinctions between UCS and T. On this basis, the construction parameters can be optimized to ensure the target design strength for both types of piles. The model test results clearly demonstrate the differences in the construction quality between the DSM method and the CS-DSM method. The technical basis established in this study serves as a cornerstone for the process control and quality assurance in installing high-quality CS-DSM piles.

     

/

返回文章
返回