土体小应变剪切模量的现场和室内试验对比及工程应用

陈少杰; 顾晓强; 高广运

doi:10.11779/CJGE2019S2034

土体小应变剪切模量的现场和室内试验对比及工程应用 English Version

陈少杰^{1, 2},
顾晓强^1,2, ,,
高广运^{1, 2}

1. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;
2. 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点试验室,上海 200092

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51822809，51738010）

详细信息

作者简介:
陈少杰(1995— ),男,河南周口人,硕士研究生,从事土体小应变刚度特性及基坑开挖变形分析等研究。E-mail: ch_shaojie@tongji.edu.cn。

通讯作者:
顾晓强，E-mail：guxiaoqiang@tongji.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 390
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 248
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-04-29
- 发布日期: 2019-07-19

Comparison and application of small strain shear moduli from field and laboratory measurements

CHEN Shao-jie^{1, 2},
GU Xiao-qiang^1,2, ,,
GAO Guang-yun^{1, 2}

1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

摘要

摘要: 土体小应变剪切模量G₀在场地地震响应和基坑变形等计算分析中有着重要作用。统计了上海典型土层的室内共振柱试验和现场原位波速测试测得的小应变剪切模量,给出了两种试验方法下的G₀的经验公式,并对比分析了室内试验和现场原位测试结果的差异。研究结果表明土体的G₀值主要由土体类别、孔隙比和平均有效应力决定,且现场试验的结果远高于室内试验的结果。进一步采用HS-Small本构模型对上海新金桥广场基坑工程的开挖变形进行数值模拟,分析了小应变剪切模量对于基坑工程变形的影响。分析结果表明,采用现场原位测试测得的小应变剪切模量进行基坑变形计算的结果与现场变形监测数据更为接近。
- 小应变剪切模量 /
- 共振柱实验 /
- 现场波速测试 /
- HSS模型 /
- 基坑开挖
Abstract: The small-strain shear modulus plays an important role in the calculations of ground seismic response and deformation in deep excavations. The values of the small strain shear modulus G₀ of Shanghai soils by field and laboratory tests are investigated and compared, and empirical formulas are proposed to predict the values of G₀. The results indicate that G₀ mainly depends on the soil type, void ratio and mean confining pressure. The values of G₀ from field tests are considerately higher than those from laboratory tests. The correlation between the small strain shear moduli from field and laboratory is also proposed. The numerical analysis is also carried out to calculate the deformation in a deep excavation in Shanghai. The small strain hardening model (HSS) is used, together with the measured small strain shear modulus. The values of G₀ are essential for the deformation of the excavation, and the predicted deformation using the G₀ value from field measurement is more accurate than that using the laboratory data based on the measured deformation in the excavation.
- small strain shear modulus /
- resonant column test /
- field shear wave measurement /
- HSS model /
- excavation

HTML全文

参考文献(10)

[1]	ATKINSON J H, SALLFORS G.Experimental determination of stress-strain-time characteristics in laboratory and in-situ tests[C]// Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam. Netherlands, 1991: 915-956.
[2]	BENZ T.Small-strain stiffness of soils and its numerical consequences[D]. Stuttgart: Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, University of Stuttgart, 2007.
[3]	徐中华, 王卫东. 敏感环境下基坑数值分析中土体本构模型的选择[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(1): 258-264. (XU Zhong-hua, WANG Wei-dong.Selection of soil constitutive models for numerical analysis of deep excavations in close proximity to sensitive properties[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(1): 258-264. (in Chinese))
[4]	王浩然. 上海软土地区深基坑变形与环境影响预测方法研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2012. (WANG Hao-ran.Prediction of deformation and response of adjacent environment of deep excavation in Shanghai soft deposit[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2012. (in Chinese))
[5]	HARDIN B O, DRNEVICH V P.Shear modulus and damping in soils[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1972, 98(7): 667-692.
[6]	HARDIN B O.Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clay[J]. J of the Soil Mechanics & Foundations Division, 1968, 94(2): 353-370.
[7]	KOKUSHO T.In-situ dynamic soil properties and their evaluations[C]// Proc 8th Asian Regional Conf on SMFE. Kyoto, 1987, 2: 215-240.
[8]	顾晓强, 陆路通, 李雄威, 等. 土体小应变刚度特性的试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报 (自然科学版), 2018, 46(3): 312-317. (GU Xiao-qiang, LU Lu-tong, LI Xiong-wei, et al.Experimental study on the small strain stiffness properties of soil[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2018, 46(3): 312-317. (in Chinese))
[9]	GU X, LU L, YANG J, WU X.Laboratory measurements of the dynamic properties of Shanghai clay[C]// Environmental Vibrations and Transportation Geodynamics, ISEV 2016. Springer, Singapore, 2016: 585-592.
[10]	梁发云, 贾亚杰, 丁钰津, 等. 上海地区软土HSS模型参数的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017(2): 269-278. (LIANG Fa-yun, JIA Ya-jie, DING Yu-jin, et al.Experimental study on parameters of HSS model for soft soil in Shanghai[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017(2): 269-278. (in Chinese))

施引文献(34)

期刊类型引用(17)

1.	任连伟，王书彪，孔纲强，杨权威，邓岳保. 综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验. 岩土力学. 2025(02): 573-581+612 . 百度学术
2.	吴行州. 基坑围护桩作用下地层支护应力分析及应用. 城市轨道交通研究. 2024(03): 125-129+134 . 百度学术
3.	赵鹏，张东海，李晓昭，张古彬，寇亚飞，高蓬辉. 基于p阶线性模型的地埋管换热器流体温度分布研究. 太阳能学报. 2024(06): 51-59 . 百度学术
4.	马奇杰，周超. 非对称循环温度荷载下2×2能源群桩倾斜性状离心机试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2024(10): 2158-2165 . 本站查看
5.	唐丽云，邵海涛，唐华明，邱培勇，杜晓奇，张蕾，彭惠. 寒区道路桥梁融雪除冰技术研究综述. 中外公路. 2024(05): 25-38 . 百度学术
6.	谢金利，覃英宏，李颖鹏，蒙相霖，谭康豪，张星月. 能源桩传热特性与热-力响应研究综述. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2023(01): 155-166 . 百度学术
7.	刘春阳，方鹏飞，张日红，谢新宇，娄扬，张秋善，朱大勇. 考虑间歇比的地热能源桩热-力性能试验研究. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2023(03): 562-572 . 百度学术
8.	周杨，孔纲强，李俊杰. 夏季工况下扩底能量桩单桩热力学响应分析. 中国公路学报. 2023(05): 65-74 . 百度学术
9.	韩志攀，贾新聪，王晓超，牛彦平. 建筑墙体碳排放优化及减碳分析. 建筑结构. 2023(S1): 2356-2360 . 百度学术
10.	陈玉，孔纲强，孟永东，王乐华，刘红程. 间歇与持续加热下含承台能量桩基础现场试验. 深圳大学学报(理工版). 2022(01): 75-84 . 百度学术
11.	陈树森，赵蕾. 能源群桩与单桩热-力学响应特性对比分析. 地下空间与工程学报. 2022(03): 788-800 . 百度学术
12.	吕成钊. 四种保温墙体的动态热响应特性测试. 建筑节能(中英文). 2022(08): 48-51 . 百度学术
13.	任连伟，韩志攀，霍继炜，高宇甲. 桩顶约束下桥梁大直径能量桩热力响应现场试验. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2022(05): 937-944+960 . 百度学术
14.	陈鑫，孔纲强，刘汉龙，江强，杨挺. 桥面融雪除冰能量桩热泵系统换热效率现场试验. 中国公路学报. 2022(11): 107-115 . 百度学术
15.	张精兵，杨军兵，肖勇，海迪，陈智. 深层埋管式能源支护桩埋管形式与换热特性研究. 建筑结构. 2022(S2): 2515-2522 . 百度学术
16.	任连伟，任军洋，孔纲强，刘汉龙. 冷热循环下PHC能量桩热力响应和承载性能现场试验. 岩土力学. 2021(02): 529-536+546 . 百度学术
17.	孟甲. 钢管桩单桩涂料防腐施工质量管控方式探讨. 珠江水运. 2021(05): 59-60 . 百度学术