• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

削减桩基负摩阻力的室内模拟试验

冯忠居, 胡海波, 董芸秀, 冯凯, 李少杰, 何静斌, 赵亚婉

冯忠居, 胡海波, 董芸秀, 冯凯, 李少杰, 何静斌, 赵亚婉. 削减桩基负摩阻力的室内模拟试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(S2): 45-48. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2019S2012
引用本文: 冯忠居, 胡海波, 董芸秀, 冯凯, 李少杰, 何静斌, 赵亚婉. 削减桩基负摩阻力的室内模拟试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(S2): 45-48. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2019S2012
FENG Zhong-ju, HU Hai-bo, DONG Yun-xiu, FENG Kai, LI Shao-jie, HE Jing-bin, ZHAO Ya-wan. Indoor simulation tests on reducing negative skin friction of pile foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S2): 45-48. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2019S2012
Citation: FENG Zhong-ju, HU Hai-bo, DONG Yun-xiu, FENG Kai, LI Shao-jie, HE Jing-bin, ZHAO Ya-wan. Indoor simulation tests on reducing negative skin friction of pile foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S2): 45-48. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2019S2012

削减桩基负摩阻力的室内模拟试验  English Version

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(41272285)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    冯忠居(1965— ),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: ysf@gl.chd.edu.cn。

    通讯作者:

    胡海波,E-mail:huhaibo0430@163.com

Indoor simulation tests on reducing negative skin friction of pile foundation

  • 摘要: 为探明桩基混凝土不同涂料对桩基负摩阻力的削减效果,通过大型剪切试验,以塑限18%的黏性土为试验土,着重研究了试验土含水率变化以及桩基混凝土侧面不同涂料对桩基负摩阻力的影响。结果表明,当黏性土含水率略大于塑限时,桩基负摩阻力的削减效果较好,此时在混凝土表面涂石蜡机油混合物、聚合物纳米材料或者油漆产生的削减效果基本一致;当黏性土含水率与塑限含水率相差较大时,采用石蜡机油混合物作为桩侧混凝土涂料对于桩基负摩阻力的削减效果最佳;可通过不同方式对中性点位置进行确定并采用不同适用条件下涂料对桩基负摩阻力进行削减。
    Abstract: In order to find out the effects of different coatings on the reduction of negative skin friction, the cohesive soil with a plastic limit of 18% as the test soil is studied based on the large shear tests. The influences of the moisture content and different coatings on the negative skin friction are emphatically studied. The results show that when the moisture content of the cohesive soil is slightly larger than that of the plastic limit, the reduction effects of negative skin friction are better, and the reduction effects of paraffin oil mixture, polymer nanomaterial or paint on concrete surface are basically the same. When the moisture content of cohesive soil differs greatly from that of the plastic limit, using the paraffin oil mixture as the pile side concrete coating has the best effects on the reduction of negative skin friction. The position of neutral point can be determined by different methods, and the negative skin friction of piles can be reduced by different applicable conditions.
  • [1] TERZAGHI K, PECK R B, MESRI G.Soil mechanics in engineering practice[J]. Soil Science, 2014, 68(5): 149-150.
    [2] 冯忠居. 基础工程[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2001.
    (FENG Zhong-ju.Foundation engineering[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2001. (in Chinese))
    [3] 聂如松, 冷伍明. 负摩阻力作用下的单桩竖向承载性状[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(4): 1539-1544.
    (NIE Ru-song, LENG WU-ming.Vertical bearing behavior of single pile subject to negative skin friction[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2013, 44(4): 1539-1544. (in Chinese))
    [4] 陈显新, 徐新跃. 桩负摩阻力的若干问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(增刊1): 4615-4618.
    (CHEN Xian-xin, XU Xin-yue.Several issues about negative skin friction of piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(S1): 4615-4618. (in Chinese))
    [5] 杨庆, 孔纲强, 郑鹏一, 等. 堆载条件下单桩负摩阻力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(10): 2805-2810.
    (YANG Qin, KONG Gang-qiang, ZHEN Peng-yi, et al.Model test study of negative skin friction for single pile under surface load[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(10): 2805-2810. (in Chinese))
    [6] 马学宁, 付江, 王军, 等. 不同堆载形式对群桩负摩阻力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(10): 3531-3538.
    (MA Xue-ning, FU Jiang, WANG Jun, et al.Effect of different surcharge loading forms on negative skin friction of pile groups[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(10): 3531-3538. (in Chinese))
    [7] HUANG T, GONG W, DAI G.Model tests on characteristics of pile foundation negative skin friction under different distributions of surcharge load[J]. Journal of Southeast University, 2015.
    [8] XING H, LIU L.Field tests on influencing factors of negative skin friction for pile foundations in collapsible loess regions[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018(2): 1-10.
    [9] SUN J J, WANG L M, HUANG X F.A study on the position of maximum negative skin friction on piles in collapsing loess ground[J]. Journal of Seismology, 2003, 23(4): 20-25.
    [10] 曹卫平, 赵敏. 黄土地基中人工挖孔扩底灌注桩负摩阻力试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(增刊1): 3167-3173.
    (CAO Wei-ping, ZHAO Min.Experimental study of negative skin friction for man-made cast in-situ belled piles in loess soil foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(S1): 3167-3173. (in Chinese))
    [11] 唐丽云, 王鑫, 杨更社, 等. 大气温度升高下冻土桩负摩阻力试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(6): 1527-1535.
    (TANG Li-yun, WANG Xin, YANG Geng-she, et al.Experimental study on negative friction resistance of pile in frozen soil under raising atmospheric temperature[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018, 14(6): 1527-1535. (in Chinese))
    [12] FELLENIUS B H.Down-drag on piles in clay due to negative skin friction[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1972, 9(4): 323-337.
    [13] MASHHOUR I, HANNA A.Drag load on end-bearing piles in collapsible soil due to inundation[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2016, 53(12): 2030-2038.
    [14] TAKAHASHI K, KATAYAMA T, SOUND S.Positive and negative skin friction on a pile in soft clayed ground at haneda[C]// GEO-COAST, Yokohama. 1991(3/4/5/6): 6-13.
    [15] TAWFIQ K S, CALIENDO J A.Bitumen coating versus plastic sheeting for reducing negative skin friction[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 1995, 7(1): 69-81.
    [16] FELLENIUS B H.Reducing negative skin friction with bitumen slip layers[J]. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1975, 101(4): 412-414.
    [17] GB/T50123—1999 土工试验方法标准[S]. 1999.
    (GB/T50123—1999 Standard for soil test method[S]. 1999. (in Chinese))
    [18] JTG94—2008 建筑桩基技术规范[S]. 2008.
    (JTG94—2008 Technical code for building pile foundations[S]. 2008. (in Chinese))
  • 期刊类型引用(17)

    1. 任连伟,王书彪,孔纲强,杨权威,邓岳保. 综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验. 岩土力学. 2025(02): 573-581+612 . 百度学术
    2. 吴行州. 基坑围护桩作用下地层支护应力分析及应用. 城市轨道交通研究. 2024(03): 125-129+134 . 百度学术
    3. 赵鹏,张东海,李晓昭,张古彬,寇亚飞,高蓬辉. 基于p阶线性模型的地埋管换热器流体温度分布研究. 太阳能学报. 2024(06): 51-59 . 百度学术
    4. 马奇杰,周超. 非对称循环温度荷载下2×2能源群桩倾斜性状离心机试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2024(10): 2158-2165 . 本站查看
    5. 唐丽云,邵海涛,唐华明,邱培勇,杜晓奇,张蕾,彭惠. 寒区道路桥梁融雪除冰技术研究综述. 中外公路. 2024(05): 25-38 . 百度学术
    6. 谢金利,覃英宏,李颖鹏,蒙相霖,谭康豪,张星月. 能源桩传热特性与热-力响应研究综述. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2023(01): 155-166 . 百度学术
    7. 刘春阳,方鹏飞,张日红,谢新宇,娄扬,张秋善,朱大勇. 考虑间歇比的地热能源桩热-力性能试验研究. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2023(03): 562-572 . 百度学术
    8. 周杨,孔纲强,李俊杰. 夏季工况下扩底能量桩单桩热力学响应分析. 中国公路学报. 2023(05): 65-74 . 百度学术
    9. 韩志攀,贾新聪,王晓超,牛彦平. 建筑墙体碳排放优化及减碳分析. 建筑结构. 2023(S1): 2356-2360 . 百度学术
    10. 陈玉,孔纲强,孟永东,王乐华,刘红程. 间歇与持续加热下含承台能量桩基础现场试验. 深圳大学学报(理工版). 2022(01): 75-84 . 百度学术
    11. 陈树森,赵蕾. 能源群桩与单桩热-力学响应特性对比分析. 地下空间与工程学报. 2022(03): 788-800 . 百度学术
    12. 吕成钊. 四种保温墙体的动态热响应特性测试. 建筑节能(中英文). 2022(08): 48-51 . 百度学术
    13. 任连伟,韩志攀,霍继炜,高宇甲. 桩顶约束下桥梁大直径能量桩热力响应现场试验. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2022(05): 937-944+960 . 百度学术
    14. 陈鑫,孔纲强,刘汉龙,江强,杨挺. 桥面融雪除冰能量桩热泵系统换热效率现场试验. 中国公路学报. 2022(11): 107-115 . 百度学术
    15. 张精兵,杨军兵,肖勇,海迪,陈智. 深层埋管式能源支护桩埋管形式与换热特性研究. 建筑结构. 2022(S2): 2515-2522 . 百度学术
    16. 任连伟,任军洋,孔纲强,刘汉龙. 冷热循环下PHC能量桩热力响应和承载性能现场试验. 岩土力学. 2021(02): 529-536+546 . 百度学术
    17. 孟甲. 钢管桩单桩涂料防腐施工质量管控方式探讨. 珠江水运. 2021(05): 59-60 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(17)

计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 34
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-04-28
  • 发布日期:  2019-07-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回