高级搜索
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

砂卵石地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖面稳定模型试验

李伟平, 李兴, 薛亚东, 张森, 葛嘉诚

李伟平, 李兴, 薛亚东, 张森, 葛嘉诚. 砂卵石地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖面稳定模型试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(S2): 199-203. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S2040
引用本文: 李伟平, 李兴, 薛亚东, 张森, 葛嘉诚. 砂卵石地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖面稳定模型试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(S2): 199-203. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S2040
shu
LI Wei-ping, LI Xing, XUE Ya-dong, ZHANG Sen, GE Jia-cheng. Model tests on face stability of shallow shield tunnels in sandy cobble strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S2): 199-203. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S2040
Citation: LI Wei-ping, LI Xing, XUE Ya-dong, ZHANG Sen, GE Jia-cheng. Model tests on face stability of shallow shield tunnels in sandy cobble strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S2): 199-203. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S2040
shu

砂卵石地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖面稳定模型试验  English Version

  • 1. 浙江省交通规划设计研究院,浙江 杭州 310006;
    2.同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;
    3. 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（41072206）; 上海市科学技术委员会资助项目（18DZ1205902）; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助（0200219209）
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李伟平(1969- ),男,教授级高级工程师,主要从事隧道及地下工程的设计与咨询工作。E-mail: 254933558@qq.com。

    通讯作者:

    李兴，E-mail：langzilixing@126.com

  • 中图分类号: TU41

Model tests on face stability of shallow shield tunnels in sandy cobble strata

  • 1. Zhejiang Transportation Planning and Design Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China;
    2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

摘要

    摘要
  • 摘要: 为探究浅埋砂卵石地层对盾构开挖的响应及开挖面的稳定性规律,设计了土压平衡盾构精细模拟装置,并开展室内模型试验研究。试验分析了浅埋砂卵石地层盾构开挖面变形对地表沉降、沉降槽形态的影响,得到了开挖面的破坏模式及变形破坏细观过程,并与纯砂地层试验进行对比。研究结果表明：①不同空间位置土体对开挖面位移的敏感性不同,但土体的破坏规律相似;②随开挖面位移增大,地层沉降-开挖面位移曲线表现出不敏感阶段、缓慢线性沉降阶段、加速沉降阶段、快速线性沉降阶段等4个阶段的规律;③浅埋情况下土体未出现局部失稳,经历弹性变形、弹塑性破坏之后直接发展为整体失稳破坏;④砂卵石土沉降槽两侧在对称性上存在差异;⑤浅埋砂卵石地层中盾构开挖对侧面土体影响范围较小,对前方土体影响范围较大。
    Abstract: In order to study the response of shallow sandy cobble strata to shield excavation and face stability, an earth pressure balance shield model is designed to conduct the indoor model tests. The failure mode and detailed process of strata are observed in these tests. The regulation of surface settlement and feature of settlement through are analyzed based on experimental data. The results show that: (1) The soil in different spatial position have different sensitivities to face displacement, but have similar failure process. (2) With the increase of the face displacement, the ground settlement-face displacement curves exhibit the regulation of ground settlement, which can be divided into four stages as insensitive stage, slow-linear settlement stage, accelerate stage and fast-linear settlement stage. (3) The directly overall instability occurs after elastic deformation and elastic-plastic failure in the shallow tunnel, and local instability has not appeared. (4) The settlement trough of sandy cobble strata is not exactly symmetrical with the tunnel axis. (5) The influenced region of the shallow tunnel in sandy cobble stratum is smaller than that of the pure sandy one in transverse, while it is greater in the longitudinal direction.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(17)
  • [1] 王明年, 魏龙海, 路军富, 等. 成都地铁卵石层中盾构施工开挖面稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(1): 99-105.
    (WANG Ming-nian, WEI Long-hai, LU Jun-fu, et al.Study of face stability of cobble-soil shield tunneling at Chengdu metro[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(1): 99-105. (in Chinese))
    [2] 葛嘉诚. 基于CDEM 的砂卵石土细观力学特性及其EPB 盾构开挖面稳定性研究[D]. 上海:同济大学, 2014.
    (GE Jia-cheng.Study on mesostructural mechanics of cobble -sand soil and its face stability using EPB shield based on CDEM numerical simulation[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2016. (in Chinese))
    [3] 胡敏. 砂卵石土物理力学特性及盾构施工响应的数值模拟研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2014.
    (HU Min.Numerical method to study the physical and mechanical characteristics of sandy pebble soil and the response caused by shield tunneling[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese))
    [4] 杨期祥. 成都地铁砂卵石层盾构开挖引起的地表沉降规律分析[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2016.
    (YANG Qi-xiang.Study on the regularity of surface settlement caused by shield tunneling in Chengdu sandy pebble stratum[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016. (in Chinese))
    [5] 郑小雪. 砂卵石地层盾构施工对邻近建筑物稳定性影响研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2008.
    (ZHENG Xiao-xue.Study on the stability of the adjacent structure induced by shield tunnel in gravel layer[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008. (in Chinese))
    [6] 白永学. 富水砂卵石地层盾构施工诱发地层塌陷机理及对策研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2012.
    (BAI Yong-xue.Research on ground collapse mechanism of shield tunneling in saturated sandy pebble stratum and corresponding measures[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012. (in Chinese))
    [7] 范祚文, 张子新. 砂卵石地层土压力平衡盾构施工开挖面稳定及邻近建筑物影响模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(12): 2506-2512.
    (FAN Zuo-wen, ZHANG Zi-xin.Model test of excavation face stability of epb shield in sandy cobble ground and adjacent building effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(12): 2506-2512. (in Chinese))
    [8] 胡雄玉, 晏启祥, 何川, 等. 土压平衡盾构掘进对散粒体地层扰动和开挖面破坏特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(8): 1618-1627.
    (HU Xiong-yu, YAN Qi-xiang, HE Chuan, et al.Study on the disturbance and excavation face failure feature of granular mixtures stratum due to epb shield tunneling[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(8): 1618-1627. (in Chinese))
    [9] SUN J Z, LIU J Y.Visualization of tunnelling- induced ground movement in transparent sand[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014(40): 236-240.
    [10] STERPI D, CIVIDINI A, SAKURAI S, et al.Laboratory model tests and numerical analysis of shallow tunnels[C]// Proceedings of the International Symposium on Eurcok’96-ISRM, Torino, 1996.
    [11] KIRSCH A.Experimental investigation of the face stability of shallow tunnels in sand[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2010, 5(1): 43-62.
    [12] 薛亚东, 杨文亮, 葛嘉诚. 盾构掌子面开挖稳定性精细模拟试验装置[P]. 中国: CN103868749A, 2014-06-18. (XUE Ya-dong, YANG Wen-liang, GE Jia-cheng. A detailed device for model test on stability of tunnel face[P]. China: CN103868749A, 2014-06-18.(in Chinese))
    [13] PECK R B.Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground[C]// Proceeding of 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico, 1969: 275-290.
    [14] 滕丽, 张桓. 盾构穿越砂卵石地层地表沉降特征细宏观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(4): 1141-1150.
    (TENG Li, ZHANG Huan.Meso-macro analysis of surface settlement characteristics during shield tunneling in sandy cobble ground[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(4): 1141-1150. (in Chinese))
    [15] 李博, 苏华友, 赵旭伟. 成都地铁盾构隧道地表沉降分析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2010, 1(4): 64-66.
    (LI Bo, SU Hua-you, ZHAO Xu-wei.Analysis on metro ground settlement caused by shield tunneling in Chengdu city[J]. Urban Mass Transit, 2010, 1(4): 64-66. (in Chinese))
    [16] 韩煊, 罗文林, 李宁. 地铁隧道施工引起沉降槽宽度的影响因素[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2009, 5(6): 1188-1193.
    (HAN Xuan, LUO Wen-lin, LI Ning.The width of settlement trough influenced by tunneling in soft ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2009, 5(6): 1188-1193. (in Chinese))
    [17] O’REILLY M P, NEW B M. Settlements above tunnels in the united kingdom-their magnitude and prediction[C]// JONES Michael, ed. Proc Tunneling 82, London, 1982: 173-181.
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献(33)

  • 期刊类型引用(17)

    1. 姚贵，张志明，袁勇，禹海涛，吴彦霖. 基于振动台试验的中庭式地铁车站地震响应数值模拟. 山东理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(03): 57-63 . 百度学术
    2. 崔春义，许民泽，许成顺，赵经彤，刘海龙，孟坤. 考虑地震需求统计不确定性的地铁车站结构地震易损性分析. 岩土工程学报. 2025(03): 453-462 . 本站查看
    3. 张启良. 大跨度无柱平顶结构地铁车站抗震分析. 智能城市. 2025(01): 148-151 . 百度学术
    4. 侯本伟，游丹，范世杰，许成顺，钟紫蓝. 基于网络效率的城市轨道交通网络抗震韧性评估. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(03): 509-519 . 百度学术
    5. 丘志杰，龙慧，汪博豪，刘璐瑶. 相邻框架结构与地铁车站的间距比对地铁车站地震响应的影响. 南华大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 26-36 . 百度学术
    6. 李维沈，李文婷，徐昊哲. 地下结构抗震性能指标限值的影响因素研究. 自然灾害学报. 2024(06): 178-191 . 百度学术
    7. 姚凡夫，杨帆，庄海洋. CFRP布加固的地铁地下车站结构中柱抗震性能研究. 震灾防御技术. 2024(04): 754-762 . 百度学术
    8. 苗晗，蒋录珍，安军海，李莎，马晓明. 叠合装配式管廊结构抗震性能水平与评价方法研究. 震灾防御技术. 2023(01): 53-64 . 百度学术
    9. 庄海洋，李晟，王伟，陈国兴. 采用不同隔震形式的双层地铁地下车站结构地震反应分析. 振动工程学报. 2023(02): 379-388 . 百度学术
    10. 白立广. 地下双层车站盖挖段主体结构施工技术. 建筑机械. 2023(08): 63-67 . 百度学术
    11. 王立新，范飞飞，汪珂，李储军，姚崇凯，甘露. 地铁车站不同减震层的减震机理及性能分析. 铁道标准设计. 2022(05): 131-139 . 百度学术
    12. 游裕鑫，邵国建，李昂，刘旭. 异跨框架式地铁地下车站结构三维非线性地震响应分析. 河南科学. 2022(04): 610-617 . 百度学术
    13. 罗永鸿，张梓鸿，许成顺，李洋. 基于Pushover分析方法的多层地铁车站地震反应研究. 震灾防御技术. 2022(01): 143-153 . 百度学术
    14. 张椿民. 地下多层地铁车站结构抗震设计对比分析. 市政技术. 2022(12): 50-58 . 百度学术
    15. 范世杰，游丹，侯本伟，许成顺. 基于网络效率的城市轨道交通网络震后性能评估. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2022(06): 1165-1173+1190 . 百度学术
    16. 陈文斌，庄海洋，李晟，陈苏. 基于柱顶隔震的3层3跨地铁地下车站结构抗震性能研究. 震灾防御技术. 2021(01): 146-156 . 百度学术
    17. 丁录董，徐军林，庄海洋，陈文斌. 预制+现浇装配式地铁地下车站结构地震反应的三维有限元分析. 世界地震工程. 2021(04): 157-166 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(16)

    • 资源附件(0)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  303
  • HTML全文浏览量:  8
  • PDF下载量:  170
  • 被引次数: 33
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-07-21
  • 发布日期:  2018-10-29

目录

摘要
HTML全文
    参考文献(17)
    相关文章
    施引文献
    资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    版权所有 © 2010水利部交通部国家能源局南京水利科学研究院 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    编辑部地址：南京市虎踞关34号《岩土工程学报》编辑部邮编：210024电话：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn