Method for lateral forces in stability analysis of concave slopes in plan view
-
摘要: 尽管凹型边坡的稳定性高于直线边坡是众所周知的,要准确计算凹型边坡的安全系数却很难,因为垂直于滑动方向侧面力对稳定性有影响,但是目前还没有合适方法计算其的大小。出于简化考虑,现有研究多按主动土压力计算该侧向力。为了检验按主动土压力计算该力的合理性,将侧面力分别按主动、静止和被动土压力取值,基于Spencer法概念推导了考虑侧压力的凹型边坡稳定性计算方法,然后用Matlab软件编制了计算程序,分析了三种土压力取值方法下,凹型边坡稳定性安全系数的差异。结果表明,将侧向压力考虑为土压力或静止土压力,凹型边坡的稳定性甚至低于相同条件直线边坡;而将侧向压力考虑为被动土压力,凹型边坡的安全系数结果又显著大于有限差分软件Flac3D分析结果,因此,将凹型边坡的侧压力简单按土压力取为主动、静止和被动土压力都是不合理的,如何计算凹型边坡的侧面力,还需要进一步深入研究。Abstract: Although it is well known that the stability of concave slopes in plan view is better than that of straight slopes, it is difficult to accurately calculate the factor of safety of concave slopes because the lateral forces perpendicular to the sliding direction have an effect on the stability, but there is no suitable method to calculate them. For the sake of simplification, the existing studies calculate the lateral forces by treating that they are active earth pressures. In order to verify the rationality of that treatment, the lateral forces are regarded as the values of active, static and passive earth pressures respectively. Based on the Spencer method, the method for calculating the stability of a concave slope is deduced considering the lateral forces. And then the calculation program is compiled by using the Matlab software to analyze the difference of factor of safety of the concave slope under three different soil pressures. The results show that by considering the lateral pressure as the earth pressure or the static earth pressure, the stability of the concave slope is even lower than that of the straight slope. When the lateral pressure is considered as the passive earth pressure, the factor of safety is significantly larger than that calculated by the finite difference software Flac3D. Therefore, it is unreasonable to simply regard the lateral pressure of the concave slope as the earth pressure as the active, static and passive earth pressures. How to calculate the lateral forces of the concave slope is still a problem to be further studied.
-
Keywords:
- concave slope /
- lateral forces /
- Spencer method /
- earth pressure
-
[1] JENIKE A W, YEN B C.Slope stability in axial symmetry[C]// Proc 5th Symposium on Rock Mechanics. Minesota, 1963: 689-711. [2] PITEAU D R, JENNINGS J E.The effects of plan geometry on the stability of natural slopes in rock in the Kimberley area of South Africa[C]// Proc 2nd Congress of the International Society of Rock Mechanics. Belgrade, 1970. [3] HOEK E, BRAY J W.Rock slope engineering[M]. 3rd ed. London: The Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1981. [4] LAM L, FREDLUND D G.A general limit equilibrium model for three-dimensional slope stability analysis[J]. Can Geotech J, 1993, 30: 905-919. [5] TOTONCHI A, ASKARI F.3D Stability analysis of concave slopes in plan view using linear finite element and lower bound method[J]. IJST, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2012, 36(C2): 191-194. [6] LORIG L.Lessons learned from slope stability studies[C]// Proceedings of the International FLAC Symposium on Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics. Minneapolis, 1999: 17-21. [7] ZHANG X.Three-dimensional stability analysis of concave slopes in plan view[J]. J Geotech Engrg, 1988, 114(6): 658-671. [8] ZHANG T W, CAI Q X.3D stability analysis method of concave slope based on the Bishop method[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2017, 27: 365-370. [9] SPENCER E.A method of analysis of embankments assuming parallel inter-slice forces[J]. Géotechnique, 1967, 17(1): 11-26. [10] ZETTLER A H, POISEL R, ROTH W, et al.Slope stability analysis based on the shear reduction technique in 3D[C]// Proceedings of the International FLAC Symposium on Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics. Minneapolis, 1999: 11-16. -
期刊类型引用(3)
1. 沈扬，邓珏，翁禾，阳龙. 分级加卸载下南海珊瑚泥一维固结长期变形试验及模型研究. 岩土力学. 2023(03): 685-696 . 
百度学术
2. 陈信升，丁选明，蒋春勇，方华强，王成龙. 吹填珊瑚岛礁钙质软泥的渗透特性试验研究. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2021(04): 58-66 . 百度学术
3. 王竞州，丁选明，蒋春勇，方华强. 钙质软土的真空预压与电渗固结室内试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2021(S2): 36-40 . 本站查看
其他类型引用(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 264
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 152
- 被引次数: 4
下载:
