酸碱污染重塑粉质黏土的塑性及其与力学特性的关系

高彦斌; 刘佳丹; 王雨滢

doi:10.11779/CJGE201811017

酸碱污染重塑粉质黏土的塑性及其与力学特性的关系 English Version

1. 同济大学土木工程学院地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;
2. 中国建筑工业出版社,北京100037

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（41772293）

详细信息

作者简介:
高彦斌(1973- ),男,博士,副教授,主要从事软土工程地质与软土工程,黏性土污染的教学和科研工作。E-mail: yanbin_gao@tongji.edu.cn。

中图分类号: TU43
计量
- 文章访问数: 0153
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0113
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-09-09
- 发布日期: 2018-11-24

Plasticity and its relationship with mechanical properties of a remolded silty clay contaminated by several acids and bases

1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
2. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing 100037, China

摘要

摘要: 酸碱溶液会显著改变黏性土的力学特性因而在污染土的研究中备受关注。通过室内试验,详细研究了硫酸、盐酸和氢氧化钠污染重塑粉质黏土的现象、孔隙水离子成分以及土的塑性、压缩性和强度的变化规律。从孔隙溶液的pH值、离子交换以及土的结构三方面解释了硫酸和氢氧化钠污染土塑性增大、盐酸污染土塑性减小的机理。给出了这3种污染土的力学特性与塑性指标之间的关系,并与一些用于非污染重塑土的经验公式进行了对比。发现这3种酸碱污染土均表现出一定的结构性,尽管结构性形成的机理并不相同,但均导致压缩性增大,适用于非污染重塑土的经验公式会低估这类污染土的压缩性。研究发现这种低浓度的污染土的结构性不足以改变不排水抗剪强度c_u与液性指数I_L之间的关系,因而其强度可以大致通过未污染土的c_u-I_L关系来预测。
- 粉质黏土 /
- 酸碱污染 /
- 塑性 /
- 力学特性 /
- 结构性
Abstract: The fact that the mechanical properties of clay can be significantly changed by acid and base solutions draws high attention in the study of the mechanical properties of contaminated soils. The change of ionic composition of pore water, soil plasticity, compressibility and strength of the remolded silty clay soaked by sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide solutions are investigated. The mechanism of the increase of plasticity by sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide contaminated samples and the decrease of plasticity of hydrochloric acid samples are explained from three aspects: pH value, ion exchange and soil structure. The relationships between mechanical properties and plasticity indexes of the three types of contaminated soils are presented, and they are compared with the empirical formulas for uncontaminated remolded clay. It is found that although the mechanisms are not the same, the three types of contaminated soils show a certain structural effect, which leads to the increase of compressibility. Therefore, the empirical formulas between plasticity and compressibility for uncontaminated remolded clay will underestimate the compressibility of these contaminated samples. However, the structural effect is not sufficient to change the relationship between undrained shear strength c_u and liquidity index I_L, so the strength of contaminated samples can be approximately predicted through the relationship between c_u and I_L of uncontaminated samples.
- silty clay /
- acid/base contamination /
- plasticity /
- mechanical property /
- structural effect

HTML全文

参考文献(22)

[1]	黄世铭. 酸碱介质对黏性土工程地质性质的影响[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 1981, 15(4): 45-49. (HUANG Shi-ming.Influence of acid-base on the engineering properties of clay[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 1981, 15(4): 45-49. (in Chinese))
[2]	顾季威. 酸碱废液污染侵蚀对黏性土工程性质的影响[J]. 上海地质, 1984(3): 12-17. (GU Ji-wei.Influence of acid-base solutions on the engineering properties of clay[J]. Shanghai Geology, 1984(3): 12-17. (in Chinese))
[3]	刘汉龙, 朱春鹏, 张晓璐. 酸碱污染土基本物理性质的室内测试研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(8): 1213-1217. (LIU Han-long, ZHU Chun-peng, ZHANG Xiao-lu.Fundamental physical properties of soil polluted by acid and alkali in laboratory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(8): 1213-1217. (in Chinese))
[4]	曹海荣. 酸性污染土物理力学性质的室内试验研究[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(自然科学版) , 2012, 27(2): 60-65. (CAO Hai-rong.Research on physical-mechanical property of soil contaminated by acid in laboratory[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology, 2012, 27(2): 60-65. (in Chinese))
[5]	GAJO A, MAINES M.Mechanical effects of aqueous solutions of inorganic acids and bases on a natural active clay[J]. Géotechnique, 2007, 57(8): 687-699.
[6]	SUNIL B M, NAYAK S, SHRIHARI S.Effect of pH on the geotechnical properties of laterite[J]. Engineering Geology, 2006, 85(1): 197-203.
[7]	BAKHSHIPOUR Z, ASADI A, HUAT B B K, et al. Effect of acid rain on geotechnical properties of residual soils[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2016, 56(6): 1008-1020.
[8]	CARRIER W D, BECKMAN J F.Correlations between index tests and the properties of remoulded clays[J]. Géotechnique, 1985, 34(34): 211-228.
[9]	NAKASE A, KAMEI T, KUSAKABE O.Constitutive parameters estimated by plasticity index[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1988, 114(7): 844-858.
[10]	KULHAWY F H, MAYNE P W.Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design[J]. Epri Palo Alto Report, 1990.
[11]	孙更生, 郑大同. 软土地基与地下工程[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1987. (SUN Geng-sheng, ZHENG Da-tong.Soft foundation and underground engineering[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1987. (in Chinese))
[12]	何美临. 上海市区浅层土黏土矿物、微结构与地面沉降[J]. 上海国土资源, 1989, 10(4): 31-40. (HE Mei-lin.The clay minerals and textures of shallow soil related with landsurface settlement in shanghai city[J]. Shanghai Land & Resources, 1989, 10(4): 31-40. (in Chinese))
[13]	SRIDHARAN A, PRAKASH K.Percussion and cone methods of determining the liquid limit of soils: controlling mechanisms[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2000, 23(2): 236-244.
[14]	SRIDHARAN A, VENKATAPPA R G.Mechanisms controlling the liquid limit of clays[J]. Proceedings, Istanbul Conf on SM and FE, 1975, 1: 75-84.
[15]	王继庄. 游离氧化铁对红黏土工程特性的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1983, 5(1): 147-156. (WANG Ji-zhuang.The effects of free iron oxides on the engineering properties of red clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1983, 5(1): 147-156. (in Chinese))
[16]	NAGARAJ T S, PANDIAN N S, NARASIMHA R P S R. Stress state-permeability relationships for fine-grained soils[J]. Géotechnique, 1993, 43(2): 333-336.
[17]	SANTAMARINA J C, KLEIN K A, PALOMINO A, et al.Micro-scale aspects of chemical-mechanical coupling: Interparticle forces and fabric[C]// Chemo-mechanical Coupling in Clays: From Nano-scale to Engineering Applications. Maratea, 2001: 47-64.
[18]	TERZAGHI K, PECK R B.Soil mechanics in engineering practice[M]. Wiley, 1967.
[19]	NAKASE A, KAMEI T, KUSAKABE O.Constitutive parameters estimated by plasticity index[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering A.s.c.e, 1988, 114(7): 844-858.
[20]	HANSBO S.A new approach to determination of shear strength of clay by the fall cone test[J]. Proc Roy SGI, 1957, 14: 5-47.
[21]	LOCAT J, DEMERS D.Viscosity, yield stress, remolded strength, and liquidity index relationships for sensitive clays[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1988, 25(4): 799-806.
[22]	LEROUIL S, TAVENAS F, LEBIHAN J P.Yield stress measurement by a penetration method[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1983, 20: 681-705.

施引文献(34)

期刊类型引用(17)

1.	任连伟，王书彪，孔纲强，杨权威，邓岳保. 综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验. 岩土力学. 2025(02): 573-581+612 . 百度学术
2.	吴行州. 基坑围护桩作用下地层支护应力分析及应用. 城市轨道交通研究. 2024(03): 125-129+134 . 百度学术
3.	赵鹏，张东海，李晓昭，张古彬，寇亚飞，高蓬辉. 基于p阶线性模型的地埋管换热器流体温度分布研究. 太阳能学报. 2024(06): 51-59 . 百度学术
4.	马奇杰，周超. 非对称循环温度荷载下2×2能源群桩倾斜性状离心机试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2024(10): 2158-2165 . 本站查看
5.	唐丽云，邵海涛，唐华明，邱培勇，杜晓奇，张蕾，彭惠. 寒区道路桥梁融雪除冰技术研究综述. 中外公路. 2024(05): 25-38 . 百度学术
6.	谢金利，覃英宏，李颖鹏，蒙相霖，谭康豪，张星月. 能源桩传热特性与热-力响应研究综述. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2023(01): 155-166 . 百度学术
7.	刘春阳，方鹏飞，张日红，谢新宇，娄扬，张秋善，朱大勇. 考虑间歇比的地热能源桩热-力性能试验研究. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2023(03): 562-572 . 百度学术
8.	周杨，孔纲强，李俊杰. 夏季工况下扩底能量桩单桩热力学响应分析. 中国公路学报. 2023(05): 65-74 . 百度学术
9.	韩志攀，贾新聪，王晓超，牛彦平. 建筑墙体碳排放优化及减碳分析. 建筑结构. 2023(S1): 2356-2360 . 百度学术
10.	陈玉，孔纲强，孟永东，王乐华，刘红程. 间歇与持续加热下含承台能量桩基础现场试验. 深圳大学学报(理工版). 2022(01): 75-84 . 百度学术
11.	陈树森，赵蕾. 能源群桩与单桩热-力学响应特性对比分析. 地下空间与工程学报. 2022(03): 788-800 . 百度学术
12.	吕成钊. 四种保温墙体的动态热响应特性测试. 建筑节能(中英文). 2022(08): 48-51 . 百度学术
13.	任连伟，韩志攀，霍继炜，高宇甲. 桩顶约束下桥梁大直径能量桩热力响应现场试验. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2022(05): 937-944+960 . 百度学术
14.	陈鑫，孔纲强，刘汉龙，江强，杨挺. 桥面融雪除冰能量桩热泵系统换热效率现场试验. 中国公路学报. 2022(11): 107-115 . 百度学术
15.	张精兵，杨军兵，肖勇，海迪，陈智. 深层埋管式能源支护桩埋管形式与换热特性研究. 建筑结构. 2022(S2): 2515-2522 . 百度学术
16.	任连伟，任军洋，孔纲强，刘汉龙. 冷热循环下PHC能量桩热力响应和承载性能现场试验. 岩土力学. 2021(02): 529-536+546 . 百度学术
17.	孟甲. 钢管桩单桩涂料防腐施工质量管控方式探讨. 珠江水运. 2021(05): 59-60 . 百度学术