• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

离子型稀土原地浸矿注液孔周含水率分布的计算模型

王观石, 赖远明, 龙平, 胡世丽, 洪本根, 桂勇

王观石, 赖远明, 龙平, 胡世丽, 洪本根, 桂勇. 离子型稀土原地浸矿注液孔周含水率分布的计算模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(5): 910-917. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201805016
引用本文: 王观石, 赖远明, 龙平, 胡世丽, 洪本根, 桂勇. 离子型稀土原地浸矿注液孔周含水率分布的计算模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(5): 910-917. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201805016
WANG Guan-shi, LAI Yuan-ming, LONG Ping, HU Shi-li, HONG Ben-gen, GUI Yong. Calculation moisture content distribution around injection hole during in-situ leaching process of ion-adsorption rare earth mines[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(5): 910-917. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201805016
Citation: WANG Guan-shi, LAI Yuan-ming, LONG Ping, HU Shi-li, HONG Ben-gen, GUI Yong. Calculation moisture content distribution around injection hole during in-situ leaching process of ion-adsorption rare earth mines[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(5): 910-917. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201805016

离子型稀土原地浸矿注液孔周含水率分布的计算模型  English Version

详细信息
    作者简介:

    王观石(1977- ),男,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事岩石动力学和渗流力学等方面的教学和科研。E-mail:wgsky010@126.com。

Calculation moisture content distribution around injection hole during in-situ leaching process of ion-adsorption rare earth mines

  • 摘要: 考虑注液孔内积水产生的压力水头在土体中的传递,建立了积水条件下的一维垂直入渗的基本方程;将实测的饱和导水率等效为孔底一维入渗的饱和导水率,采用积水条件一维垂直入渗的基本方程计算注液孔孔底中心垂向的含水率分布;假设入渗过程中形成的湿润锋簇上的含水率增量相等,根据累积注液量等于湿润体内的水分增加量,确定湿润锋簇中各湿润锋的位置,结合注液孔孔底中心垂向的含水率分布,确定湿润体内含水率分布。在龙南足洞某稀土矿山选择一场地较平整的矿块进行单孔注液试验,在注液孔周布置4个测点,采用FDS-100水分传感器记录测点位置在入渗过程中不同时刻的含水率,与模型的计算值进行比较,结果发现,4个测点的实测值与计算值相关系数基本在0.900以上,模型的计算误差均在10%以下,满足工程误差要求,说明此方法能较为准确的计算出注液孔内水分入渗过程及湿润体内含水率分布。
    Abstract: Ponding in injection hole will generate pressure head in soil surface. Considering the transfer of the pressure head through the soil, a basic equation for one-dimensional vertical infiltration under ponding is developed. The measured saturated hydraulic conductivity is regarded to be equivalent to that of one-dimensional infiltration, and the distribution rules of moisture content along the vertical direction of the injection hole of the hole bottem is calculated by the basic equation for one-dimensional vertical infiltration under ponding. Assuming that the moisture content increment is equal in each wetting front which is formed during infiltration process, and according to that the cumulative liquid injection is equal to the moisture increment in the wetted region, each wetting front is obtained. Considering with the moisture content distribution along the vertical direction of the injection hole of the hole bottom, the moisture content distribution in the wetted region is determined. A smooth ore block in Zudong rare earth mine in China is chosen to perform single-hole injection tests, and 4 measuring points are arranged around the injection hole. During the infiltration process, the moisture contents at measuring points are recorded by FDS-100 moisture sensors. By comparing the values calculated by the proposed model with the test ones, it is found that the correlation coefficient between the calculated values and the requirements is satisfactory. During the infiltration process, the moisture content distribution in the wetted region is calculated accurately by the established model.
  • [1] 杜 雯. 离子型稀土原地浸矿工艺对环境影响的研究[J]. 有色金属科学与工程, 2001, 15(1): 41-44. (DU Wen. The impact of in-situ leaching on the natural environment of ion-type RE mine[J]. Nonferrous Metals Science and Engineering, 2001, 15(1): 41-44. (in Chinese))
    [2] 袁长林. 中国南岭淋积型稀土溶浸采矿正压系统的地质分类与开采技术[J]. 稀土, 2010, 31(2): 75-79. (YUAN Chang-lin. Leaching mining positive pressure system's geological classification and corresponding mining technology of Chinese Nanling illuviation rare earth[J]. Chinese Rare Earths, 2010, 31(2): 75-79. (in Chinese))
    [3] 池汝安, 田 君, 罗仙平, 等. 风化壳淋积型稀土矿的基础研究[J]. 有色金属科学与工程, 2012, 3(4): 1-13. (CHI Ru-an, TIAN Jun, LUO Xian-ping, et al. The basic research on the weathered crust elution-deposited rare earth ores[J]. Nonferrous Metals Science and Engineering, 2012, 3(4): 1-13. (in Chinese))
    [4] 李永绣. 离子吸附型稀土资源与绿色提取[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2015. (LI Yong-xiu. Ion adsorption rare earth resources and their green extraction[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2015. (in Chinese))
    [5] 池汝安, 王淀佐. 稀土矿物加工[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014. (CHI Ru-an, WANG Ding-zuo. Rare-earth’s mineral processing[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014. (in Chinese))
    [6] MISHRA S K, TYAGI J V, SINGH V P. Comparison of infiltration models[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2003, 17(13): 2629-2652.
    [7] GREEN W H, AMPT G A. Studies on soil physics: flow of air and water through soils[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1911, 4(1): 1-24.
    [8] KALE R V, SAHOO B. Green-ampt infiltration models for varied field conditions: a revisit[J]. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(14): 3505-3536.
    [9] CHU X, MARIÑO M A. Determination of ponding condition and infiltration into layered soils under unsteady rainfall[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 313(3): 195-207 .
    [10] 张 杰, 韩同春, 豆红强, 等. 探讨考虑气阻作用下分层假定的雨水入渗计算分析模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(12): 2219-2225. (ZHANG Jie, HAN Tong-chun, DOU Hong-qiang, et al. Analysis model for rainwater infiltration considering gas resistance under stratified assumption [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(12): 2219-2225. (in Chinese))
    [11] CHU S T. Green‐ampt analysis of wetting patterns for surface emitters[J]. Journal of Irrigation & Drainage Engineering, 1994, 120(2): 414-421.
    [12] SEPASKHAH A R, CHITSAZ H. Validating the green-ampt analysis of wetted radius and depth in trickle irrigation[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2004, 89(2): 231-236.
    [13] 张培文, 刘德富, 黄达海, 等. 饱和-非饱和非稳定渗流的数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2003, 24(6): 927-930. (ZHANG Pei-wen, LIU De-fu, HUANG Da-hai, et al. Saturated-unsaturated unsteady seepage flow numerical simulation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2003, 24(6): 927-930. (in Chinese))
    [14] 付建新, 宋卫东, 杜建华. 考虑二维降雨入渗的非饱和土边坡瞬态体积含水率分析[J]. 工程科学学报, 2015, 37(4): 407-413. (FU Jian-xin, SONG Wei-dong, DU Jian-hua. Transient volume water content analysis of unsaturated soil slopes considering two-dimensional rainfall infiltration[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2015, 37(4): 407-413. (in Chinese))
    [15] 雷志栋, 杨诗秀, 谢森传. 土壤水动力学[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1988. (LEI Zhi-dong, YANG Shi-xiu, XIE Seng-chuan. Soil water dynamics[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1988. (in Chinese))
    [16] VAN GENUCHTEN M T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44(5): 892-898.
    [17] NING L, WILLIAM J L. 非饱和土力学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2012. (NING L, WILLIAM J L. Unsaturated soil mechanics[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2012. (in Chinese))
    [18] 赵伟霞, 张振华, 蔡焕杰, 等. 恒定水头井入渗Green-Ampt模型的改进与验证[J]. 水利学报, 2010, 41(4): 464-470. (ZHAO Wei-xia, ZHANG Zhen-hua, CAI Huan-jie, et al. Improvement and verification of the Green-Ampt model for constant-head well permeameter[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010, 41(4): 464-470. (in Chinese))
  • 期刊类型引用(25)

    1. 王朋飞,祝壮,孙中光,曲越,张衡,李培现. 长壁工作面开采时间间隔对倾向主断面地表沉陷的影响研究. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2025(02): 282-293 . 百度学术
    2. 丁星丞,李培现,康新亮,王明亮,张涛,郝登程. 融合概率积分法与SBAS-InSAR的开采沉陷计算方法. 矿业科学学报. 2025(01): 48-56 . 百度学术
    3. 韩春鹏,杜超,史梁,祖发金,柴晓鹤. 老采空区地表沉降预测合理监测模式分析. 工程勘察. 2024(02): 48-53 . 百度学术
    4. 张梦华. 羊东矿保护煤柱开采地表变形研究. 煤炭与化工. 2024(03): 27-29+33 . 百度学术
    5. 郭庆彪,余庆,郑美楠,罗锦. 测线布设形态与测点缺失对采煤沉陷预计参数反演的影响. 煤田地质与勘探. 2024(06): 57-68 . 百度学术
    6. 孙述海,王文斌,齐树明,姜佃卿,孙玥,岳伟佳. 新阳煤矿三、四采区地表移动变形规律研究. 资源信息与工程. 2024(04): 59-63 . 百度学术
    7. 张玮,陈迪,袁利伟,郭庆,李晨洋,李彧,李袁松,李春辉,陈明辉. 基于概率积分法的露地联采地表移动影响范围划定分析. 采矿技术. 2024(05): 12-20 . 百度学术
    8. 孙志豪,徐良骥,刘潇鹏. 一种基于分段加权赋参的厚松散层矿区沉陷预计方法. 金属矿山. 2024(11): 132-141 . 百度学术
    9. 王文才,吴周康,高小雷,王鹏. 非充分采动条件下地表移动概率积分法预测. 煤炭技术. 2023(06): 1-4 . 百度学术
    10. 杨晓玉,朱晓峻. 基于稳健遗传算法的矿山开采沉陷预计参数反演. 金属矿山. 2023(08): 237-244 . 百度学术
    11. 滕永佳,阎跃观,郭伟,姜岩,胡耀东. 不规则工作面开采地表沉陷线积分预计方法. 矿业科学学报. 2022(01): 82-88 . 百度学术
    12. 胡辉东,李贤庆,陈纯芳,刘洋,张博翔. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区J58井区盒一段甜点储层特征及主控因素. 矿业科学学报. 2022(01): 71-88 . 百度学术
    13. 程桦,张亮亮,姚直书,彭世龙,郭龙辉. 厚松散层薄基岩非对称开采井筒偏斜机理. 煤炭学报. 2022(01): 102-114 . 百度学术
    14. 张劲满,阎跃观,李杰卫,徐瑞瑞,王芷馨,张坤,岳彩亚. 概率积分预计参数的ENN优化算法. 金属矿山. 2022(05): 170-176 . 百度学术
    15. 周佳薇,吴鑫,刘峰. 煤矿综放开采地表移动规律. 测绘技术装备. 2022(02): 130-134 . 百度学术
    16. 黄金中,王磊,李靖宇,蒋创,滕超群,李忠,李世保. 群智能优化算法反演概率积分参数的性能比较与分析. 金属矿山. 2022(08): 173-181 . 百度学术
    17. 丁一,邓念东,姚婷,刘东海,尚慧. 地质采矿条件对铁路路基沉陷预测影响研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2022(07): 135-145 . 百度学术
    18. 李勇,贺鑫,李培现,王炳,杨中辉,张芷祺,杨可明. 煤矿地表塌陷区天眼巡查监测系统设计及应用. 煤炭工程. 2022(12): 157-163 . 百度学术
    19. 叶伟,徐良骥,张坤. 概率积分法参数反演的SAAFC模型. 金属矿山. 2021(04): 139-148 . 百度学术
    20. 李靖宇,王磊,朱尚军,滕超群,江克贵. 基于狼群算法的概率积分法模型参数反演方法研究. 中国矿业. 2020(10): 102-109 . 百度学术
    21. 陈兴达,余学祥,池深深,汪涛,陈卫卫. 基于多种群遗传算法的概率积分法参数反演. 煤矿安全. 2020(11): 50-54+60 . 百度学术
    22. 曲相屹,李学良. 长壁开采工作面地表岩移参数求取方法分析. 水力采煤与管道运输. 2019(02): 39-41 . 百度学术
    23. 李学良. 建筑物开采损害鉴定方法评价及应用. 矿山测量. 2019(04): 9-12 . 百度学术
    24. 袁鑫,王远坚,郑健,李鹏宇,胡重戎,姜岩. 基于弹性薄板理论的地表下沉预计模型. 金属矿山. 2019(10): 37-41 . 百度学术
    25. 黄晖,池深深,韩必武,刘可胜. 基于PCA-BP神经网络的概率积分法参数算法研究. 黑龙江科学. 2019(24): 1-5 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(16)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  273
  • HTML全文浏览量:  7
  • PDF下载量:  179
  • 被引次数: 41
出版历程
  • 修回日期:  2017-02-22
  • 发布日期:  2018-05-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回