沉管隧道-接头-场地土振动台试验研究

陈红娟; 闫维明; 陈适才; 张学明

doi:10.11779/CJGE201804007

沉管隧道-接头-场地土振动台试验研究 English Version

1. 中国地震局地球物理研究所,北京 100081;
2. 北京工业大学工程抗震与结构诊治北京市重点实验室,北京 100124;

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51708519）; 中国地震局地球物理研究所基本科研业务专项项目（DQJB18B15）; 北京市自然科学基金项目（8164067）

详细信息

作者简介:
陈红娟(1982- ),女,博士后,副研究员,主要从事土动力学与地下结构抗震研究。E-mail：chenyu94@163.com。

通讯作者:
闫维明，E-mail：yanwm@bjut.edu.cn

中图分类号: TU354
计量
- 文章访问数: 328
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 287
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-01-02
- 发布日期: 2018-04-24

Shaking table tests on immersed tunnel-joint-soil

1. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China;
2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Retrofit, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;

摘要

摘要: 为了解沉管隧道及其接头在地震作用下的动力响应,以中国广州洲头咀沉管隧道工程为背景,在北京工业大学九子振动台台阵系统上开展了1∶60比例尺大型沉管隧道-接头-场地土振动台模型试验。试验中模型箱采用装配式连续体刚性模型箱,其尺寸为7.7 m（长）×3.2 m（宽）×1.2 m（高）,试验中输入地震动时程采用El Centro、Taft、天津及广州人工地震动记录,输入方向为水平横向和水平纵向一致地震动激励。设计了用于模拟沉管隧道接头的构件,并利用拉压传感器和激光位移计测得接头处所受轴向力及变形。结果表明：不同段模型结构测得的加速度及其傅立叶幅值谱有差别,且隧道结构地震响应不是随其自身特性振动,而是服从于周围土体的地震响应;不同强度地震动激励下,不同接头的受力情况可以为沉管隧道的抗震设计提供有价值的参考;不同强度地震激励下,不同接头的位移变化趋势基本上遵循J1接头位移最大,J3接头位移次之,J2接头位移最小,由于J2接头位于中间,这样的变化规律使得整个隧道沿纵向变形更加协调;水平纵向和水平横向一致地震激励下,每个接头的正反方向位移变化趋势基本平行,本次试验结果换算到原型结构,隧道接头止水带处于安全范围不会漏水。
- 沉管隧道 /
- 接头 /
- 振动台试验 /
- 动力响应 /
- 一致地震动激励
Abstract: To obtain the dynamic response of the immersed tunnel and its joints under seismic action, with Zhoutouzui immersed tunnel project in China as the background, a series of shaking table tests on immersed tunnel-joint-soil with a scaling factor of 1/60 are conducted under uniform earthquake excitation by using the multiple shaking table test system in Beijing University of Technology. They are performed using a rigid prefabricated continuous model box with the dimensions of 7.7 meters long, 3.2 meters wide and 1.2 meters high. The test system is subjected to strong ground motions from El Centro record, Taft record, Tianjin record and Guangzhou artificial record through horizontal longitudinal and horizontal transverse uniform seismic excitations. The model tunnel joint components are designed to simulate the immersed tunnel joint, and the axial force and deformation of joints are obtained by using the pull-press sensors and laser displacement sensors. The test results show that the acceleration time histories and their Fourier spectra of different model tunnel segments are different from each other. And the seismic response of the tunnel structure is not vibration along with its own features, but is subject to the seismic response of the surrounding soils. Under the seismic excitation with different intensities, the force distribution of joints can provide valuable reference for aseismic design of the immersed tunnels. Under different seismic inputs with different intensities, the displacement of joint 1 is the maximum, and that of joint 2 is the minimum. Such change law makes the whole tunnel along the longitudinal deformation more harmonious. The change trend of displacements along the positive and negative directions at each joint is basicly parallel. The practical water stop of tunnels is in a safe range and will not leak by converting the test results to the prototype data.
- immersed tunnel /
- joint /
- shaking table test /
- dynamic response /
- uniform seismic excitation

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	叶海林, 郑颖人, 杜修力, 等. 边坡动力破坏特征的振动台模型试验与数值分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2012, 45(9): 128-135. (YE Hai-lin, ZHENG Ying-ren, DU Xiu-li, et al.Shaking table model test and numerical analysis on dynamic failure characteristics of slope[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(9): 128-135. (in Chinese))
[2]	刘鹏, 丁文其, 杨波. 沉管隧道接头刚度模型研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(增刊2): 133-139. (LIU Peng, DING Wen-qi, YANG Bo.Model for stiffness of joints of immersed tube tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(S2): 133-139. (in Chinese))
[3]	黎伟, 房营光, 莫海鸿, 等. 砂流法施工致沉管隧道管段竖向位移的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(6): 1102-1108. (LI Wei, FANG Ying-guang, MO Hai-hong, et al.Vertical displacement of tube segment of immersed tunnels caused by sand flow construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(6): 1102-1108. (in Chinese))
[4]	GLERUM A.Developments in immersed tunnelling in holland[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1995, 10(4): 455-462.
[5]	GRANTZ W C.Steel-shell immersed tunnels-forty years of experience[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1997, 12(1): 23-31.
[6]	刘鸿哲, 黄茂松. 超长沉管隧道纵向地震响应频域分析方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(11): 1971-1978. (LIU Hong-zhe, HUANG Mao-song.Frequency-domain analysis method for longitudinal seismic response of super-long immersed tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(11): 1971-1978. (in Chinese))
[7]	HU Zhi-nan, XIE Yong-li, WANG Jun.Challenges and strategies involved in designing and constructing a 6 km immersed tunnel: a case study of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 50: 171-177.
[8]	OKAMOTO S, TAMURA C.Behaviour of subaqueous tunnels during earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1973, 1: 253-266.
[9]	严松宏, 潘昌实. 沉管隧道地震响应分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2006, 43(2): 15-21. (YAN Song-hong, PAN Chang-shi.Seismic response analyses of an immersed tube tunnel[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2006, 43(2): 15-21. (in Chinese))
[10]	傅继阳, 吴玖荣, 徐安. 广州洲头咀沉管隧道地震响应研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 35(9): 23-27. (FU Ji-yang, WU Jiu-rong, XU An.Seismic response of Zhoutouzui immersed tunnel in Guangzhou[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2008, 35(9): 23-27. (in Chinese))
[11]	DING Jun-hong, JIN Xian-long, GUO Yi-zhi, et al.Numerical simulation for large-scale seismic response analysis of immersed tunnel[J]. Engineering and Structures, 2006, 28: 1367-1377.
[12]	Anastasopoulos. Nonlinear response of deep immersed tunnel to strong seismic shaking[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133: 1067-1090.
[13]	LYNGS J H.Model accuracy in aseismic design of immersed tunnel[D]. Aalborg: Aalborg University, 2008.
[14]	VAN OORSOUW R S. Behaviour of segment joints in immersed tunnels under seismic loading[D]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2010.
[15]	白龙, 赵旭, 杜修力, 等. 沉管隧道接头地震动力响应分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2015, 35(2): 153-159. (BAI Long, ZHAO Xu, DU Xiu-li, et al.Seismic response of joints of immersed tube tunnels[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Engineering, 2015, 35(2): 153-159. (in Chinese))
[16]	楼梦麟, 董云, 张如林. 沉管隧道地震反应分析局部精细化建模中的几个问题[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(9): 1705-1712. (LOU Meng-lin, DONG Yun, ZHANG Ru-lin.Several problems in refined local modeling for seismic response analysis of immersed tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(9): 1705-1712. (in Chinese))
[17]	陈红娟, 闫维明, 陈适才, 等. 小比例尺地下结构振动台试验模型土的设计与试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 35(3): 59-66. (CHEN Hong-juan, YAN Wei-ming, CHEN Shi-cai, et al.Design and experimental research on model soil used for shaking table test of a small scale underground structure[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2015, 35(3): 59-66. (in Chinese))
[18]	陈红娟, 李小军, 闫维明, 等. 锯末混合土地基自由场振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(11): 2068-2077. (CHEN Hong-juan, LI Xiao-jun, YAN Wei-ming, et al.Study on shaking table test of sawdust mixed clay site model[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(11): 2068-2077. (in Chinese))