浅埋地下结构地震反应分析的惯性力-位移法

杜修力; 许紫刚; 许成顺; 李洋

doi:10.11779/CJGE201804001

浅埋地下结构地震反应分析的惯性力-位移法 English Version

北京工业大学城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目（51421005）; 教育部“创新团队发展计划”项目（IRT13044）

详细信息

作者简介:
杜修力(1962- ),男,长江学者特聘教授,博士生导师,主要从事地震工程领域研究。E-mail：duxiuli@bjut.edu.cn。

中图分类号: TU435;TU92
计量
- 文章访问数: 0360
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0495
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-12-06
- 发布日期: 2018-04-24

Inertia force-displacement method for seismic analysis of shallow buried underground structures

Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;

摘要

摘要: 现有的地下结构地震反应简化分析方法,如：地震系数法、自由场变形法、柔度系数法、反应位移法、反应加速度法和Pushover分析方法等,均没有考虑上覆回填堆积土体或地震中因剪切破坏失效后的上覆堆积土体在竖向地震作用下产生的惯性力效应。已有研究表明,这种上覆土体竖向惯性力效应对浅埋地下结构支撑构件的抗震性能（抗剪强度和极限变形）有重要影响,是评价浅埋地下结构抗震安全性的关键因素之一,不能忽视。为此,针对浅埋地下结构地震反应分析问题,提出了一种考虑上覆土体竖向惯性力影响的反应位移法,简称惯性力-位移法。给出了惯性力-位移法分析模型的两个关键参数确定方法,包括地基弹簧刚度及上覆土体最大竖向惯性力。工程实例分析结果表明,建议的惯性力-位移法与传统的反应位移法相比,不仅克服了传统的反应位移法不能给出中柱轴力的缺陷外,其它反应量的计算精度与之基本相当。
- 地下结构 /
- 抗震分析 /
- 惯性力-位移法
Abstract: As for the existing practical methods for seismic analysis of underground structures, including seismic coefficient method, free-field racking deformation method, flexible coefficient method, response displacement method, response acceleration method and Pushover analysis method, the inertia force of overburden backfilled soil or overburden soil which has shear failure under the vertical ground motion is not considered. The recent researches show that the vertical inertia force of overburden soil has important influence on the seismic performances (shear strength and ultimate deformation) of support components for shallow buried underground structures. And it is also one of the critical factors in the seismic safety evaluation of shallow buried underground structures, which cannot be ignored. A response displacement method is proposed for seismic analysis of shallow buried underground structures considering the vertical inertia force of overburden soil, called inertia force-displacement method for short. The determination methods for two critical parameters are given, including the foundation spring coefficient and the maximum vertical inertia force of overburden soil layer. The analysis results of engineering projects show that the inertia force-displacement method overcomes the defect of the classical response displacement methods which cannot calculate the axial force of the center column, and the other results have a similar calculation accuracy compared with those of the classical response displacement methods.
- underground structure /
- seismic analysis /
- inertia force-displacement method

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	陈国兴, 陈苏, 杜修力, 等. 城市地下结构抗震研究进展[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2016, 36(1): 1-23. (CHEN Guo-xing, CHEN Su, DU Xiu-li, et al.Review of seismic damage, model test, available design and analysis methods of urban underground structures: retrospect and prospect[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2016, 36(1): 1-23. (in Chinese))
[2]	AN X, SHAWKY A A, MAEKAWA K.The collapse mechanism of a subway station during the Great Hanshin Earthquake[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 1997, 19(3): 241-257.
[3]	杜修力, 王刚, 路德春. 日本阪神地震中大开地铁车站地震破坏机理分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2016, 36(2): 165-171. (DU Xiu-li, WANG Gang, LU De-chun.Earthquake damage mechanism analysis of Dakai metro station by Kobe earthquake[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2016, 36(2): 165-171. (in Chinese))
[4]	还毅, 方秦, 陈力, 等. 强震作用下地铁车站结构损伤破坏的三维非线性动力分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2011, 37(6): 852-862. (HUAN Yi, FANG Qin, CHEN Li, et al.3D nonlinear damage analysis of metro-station structures under strong seismic loading[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2011, 37(6): 852-862. (in Chinese))
[5]	许成顺, 许紫刚, 杜修力, 等. 地下结构实用抗震分析方法比较研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2017, 37(2): 65-80. (XU Cheng-shun, XU Zi-gang, DU Xiu-li, et al.Comparative study of simplified methods for seismic analysis of underground structure[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2017, 37(2): 65-80. (in Chinese))
[6]	施仲衡. 地下铁道设计与施工[M]. 西安: 陕西科学技术出版社, 1997. (SHI Zhong-heng.Design and construction of underground railway[M]. Xi'an: Shaanxi Science and Technique Publishing House, 1997. (in Chinese))
[7]	NEWMARK N M.Problems in wave propagation in soil and rock[C]// Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth Materials. New Mexico, 1968.
[8]	WANG J N.Seismic design of tunnels: A simple state-of-the-art design approach[M]. New York: Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas Inc, 1993.
[9]	HASHASH Y M A, HOOK J J, SCHMIDT B, et al. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures[J]. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(4): 247-293.
[10]	PENZIEN J.Seismically induced racking of tunnel linings[J]. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 2000, 29(5): 683-691.
[11]	RAMAZI H, JIGHEH H S. The Bam (Iran) Earthquake of December 26, 2003: from an engineering and seismological point of view[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2006, 27(5): 576-584.
[12]	BHALLA S, YANG Y W, ZHAO J, et al.Structural health monitoring of underground facilities-technological issues and challenges[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2005, 20(5): 487-500.
[13]	川岛一彦. 地下构筑物の耐震设计[M]. 日本: 鹿岛出版会, l994. (KAWAJIMA K.Aseismic design of underground structure[M]. Japan: Kajima Institute Publishing Co Ltd, 1994. (in Japanese))
[14]	NISHIDA M, MATSUI T.Applicability of seismic deformation method to aseismic analysis of underground linear structure[C]// The Fourteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Toulon, 2004: 600-606.
[15]	李亮, 杨晓慧, 杜修力. 地下结构地震反应计算的改进的反应位移法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(7): 1360-1364. (LI Liang, YANG Xiao-hui, DU Xiu-li.Improved response displacement method for evaluating seismic responses of underground structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(7): 1360-1364. (in Chinese))
[16]	刘晶波, 王文晖, 赵冬冬, 等. 地下结构抗震分析的整体式反应位移法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(8): 1618-1624. (LIU Jing-bo, WANG Wen-hui, ZHAO Dong-dong, et al.Integral response deformation method for seismic analysis of underground structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(8): 1618-1624. (in Chinese))
[17]	GB50011—2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 2010. (GB50011—2010 Code for seismic design of buildings[S]. 2010. (in Chinese))
[18]	GB50909—2014 城市轨道交通结构抗震设计规范[S]. 2014. (GB50909—2014 Code for seismic design of urban rail transit structures[S]. 2014. (in Chinese))
[19]	TATEISHI A.A study on seismic analysis methods in the cross section of underground structures using static finite element method[J]. Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering, 2005, 22(1): 41-54.
[20]	刘晶波, 刘祥庆, 李彬. 地下结构抗震分析与设计的Pushover分析方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2008, 41(4): 73-80. (LIU Jing-bo, LIU Xiang-qing, LI Bin.A pushover analysis method for seismic analysis and design of underground structures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2008, 41(4): 73-80. (in Chinese))
[21]	曹炳政, 罗奇峰, 马硕, 等. 神户大开地铁车站的地震反应分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2002, 22(4): 102-107. (CAO Bing-zheng, LUO Qi-feng, MA Shuo, et al.Seismic response analysis of Dakai subway station in Hyogoken-nanbu earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2002, 22(4): 102-107. (in Chinese))
[22]	UENISHI K, SAKURAI S.Characteristic of the vertical seismic waves associated with the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe), Japan earthquake estimated from the failure of the Daikai Underground Station[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2000, 29(6): 813-821.
[23]	杜修力, 马超, 路德春, 等. 大开地铁车站地震破坏模拟与机理分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50(1): 53-62. (DU Xiu-li, MA Chao, LU De-chun, et al.Collapse simulation and failure mechanism analysis of the Daikai station under seismic loads[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50(1): 53-62. (in Chinese))
[24]	中村晋. 層間変形に基づく地中構造物の横断方向の耐震設計法に関する提案[J]. 土木学会論文集, 1998(605): 217-230. (NAKAMURA S. Proposal of seismic design method for underground structure based on the relative displacement between ceiling and base slab[J]. Journal of JSCE, 1998(605): 217-230. ( in Japanese))
[25]	BARDET J P, ICHII K, LIN C H.EERA: a computer program for equivalent-linear earthquake site response analysis of layered soil deposits User’s Manual[M]. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 2000.
[26]	杜修力, 李洋, 赵密, 等. 下卧刚性基岩条件下场地土-结构体系地震反应分析方法研究[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(5): 52-59. (DU Xiu-li, LI Yang, ZHAO Mi, et al.Seismic response analysis method for soil-structure interaction system of underlying rigid rock base soil condition[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(5): 52-59. (in Chinese))
[27]	IIDA H, HIROTO T, YOSHIDA N, et al.Damage to Daikai subway station[J]. Special Issue of Soils and Foundations, 1996, 1: 283-300.

施引文献(13)

期刊类型引用(6)

1.	张德沧，毛佳，戴妙林，邵琳玉，赵兰浩. 圆化离散单元法的改进及其在岩体断裂过程中的应用. 岩土工程学报. 2024(09): 1974-1983 . 本站查看
2.	何荣兴，张智源，张星宇，章雅雯. 诱导下岩体裂隙扩展规律研究存在问题及对策. 中国矿业. 2024(10): 168-176 . 百度学术
3.	刘洋，吴志军，储昭飞，翁磊，徐翔宇，周原，高波，毛春光. 基于FDEM的围压条件下机械冲击破岩机理研究. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 866-879 . 百度学术
4.	杨奎斌，朱彦鹏. 考虑后缘裂缝影响的均质土坡滑动面形式及搜索研究. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2022(05): 1216-1227 . 百度学术
5.	张亚军，莫思阳，张友良. 基于修正牛顿-拉普森迭代的数值流形法. 计算机仿真. 2022(09): 394-397+440 . 百度学术
6.	韩笑. 基于高阶块体元-有限元建模的混凝土细观数值分析. 粉煤灰综合利用. 2021(03): 56-63 . 百度学术

其他类型引用(7)

资源附件(0)

计量

文章访问数:
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量:
被引次数: 13

浅埋地下结构地震反应分析的惯性力-位移法 English Version

作者简介: 杜修力(1962- ),男,长江学者特聘教授,博士生导师,主要从事地震工程领域研究。E-mail：duxiuli@bjut.edu.cn。

计量

出版历程

Inertia force-displacement method for seismic analysis of shallow buried underground structures

期刊类型引用(6)

其他类型引用(7)

计量

出版历程

目录

作者简介:
杜修力(1962- ),男,长江学者特聘教授,博士生导师,主要从事地震工程领域研究。E-mail：duxiuli@bjut.edu.cn。