粗粒土三轴试样端部约束影响研究

陆晓平; 孙明辉; 陈浩锋; 褚福永

doi:10.11779/CJGE2017S1047

粗粒土三轴试样端部约束影响研究 English Version

1. 江苏省秦淮河水利工程管理处,江苏南京 210022;
2. 河海大学岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏南京 210098;
3. 中设设计集团股份有限公司,江苏南京 210014;
4. 常州市建筑科学研究院股份有限公司,江苏常州 213000;
5. 丽水学院工程与设计学院,浙江丽水 323000

基金项目: 浙江省自然科学基金项目（LY14E080004）; 国家自然科学基金项目（51479052）; 江苏省六大人才高峰项目（JZ-011）

详细信息

作者简介:
陆晓平(1966-),女,江苏泰兴人,高级工程师,主要从事水利工程方面的研究。E-mail:njlxp302@163.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 280
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 196
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-11-27
- 发布日期: 2017-11-19

Effects of end restraint in triaxial tests on coarse-grained soil

1. Management Division of Qinhuai River Hydraulic Engineering of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210022, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098;
3. China Design Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210014, China;
4. Changzhou Architectural Research Institute Co., Ltd, Changzhou 213000, China;
5. School of Civil Engineering, Lishui University, Lishui 323000, China

摘要

摘要: 对两种级配的砾石料,分别进行了两种中三轴固结排水剪试验,一种是试样端部采用润滑试样帽法以减轻端部约束对三轴试验的影响;另一种试样则是常规三轴固结排水剪试验,即不采取端部减摩措施。对比分析两种试验的结果,以研究端部约束对三轴试样变形及强度的影响,分析润滑试样帽法对粗粒土试样的端部减摩效果。结果表明：试样在剪切过程中均表现出不同程度的剪胀性,常规三轴试样体积变形比减轻端部约束试样体积变形略小;当试验围压较低时,减轻端部约束对试样偏应力峰值影响相对显著,而高围压下,润滑试样帽法的减摩作用几乎消失;同样,内摩擦角,初始切线模量E_i,割线弹性模量E₁均比常规三轴试验的小;随着围压的不断增大,润滑试样帽法减轻端部约束的效果明显减弱。
- 粗粒土 /
- 三轴试验 /
- 端部约束 /
- 润滑试样帽
Abstract: The end restraint can be eliminated by lubrication sample cap to some extent in the conventional triaxial tests. A comparison is made between the conventional triaxial tests and the end friction reduced triaxial tests in order to study the effects of the end restraint on the test results. The results show that different degrees of dilatancy is shown during the tests. The degree of volume deformation of the conventional triaxial test specimen is smaller. The measures to reduce the end friction have marked effects on the peak strength under low confining pressure. But with the increase of the confining pressure the effects of the lubrication sample cap method to reduce the end friction become worse. Under the same confining pressure, the internal friction angle , the initial Young's modulus E_i and the secant modulus E₁ of the end friction reduced triaxial tests are smaller than those of the conventional triaxial tests.
- coarse-grained soil /
- triaxial test /
- end restraint /
- lubrication sample cap

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	朱俊高, MOHAMED A ALsakran, 龚选, 等. 某板岩粗粒料湿化特性三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(1): 170-174. (ZHU Jun-gao, MOHAMED A ALsakran, GONG Xuan, et al. Triaxial tests on wetting deformation behavior of a slate rockfill material[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(1): 170-174. (in Chinese))
[2]	缪林昌, 崔颖, 陈可君, 等. 非饱和重塑膨胀土的强度试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(2): 274-276. (MIAO Lin-chang, CUI Ying, CHEN Ke-jun, et al. Test on strength of unsaturated remolded expansive soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(2): 274-276. (in Chinese))
[3]	詹良通, 吴宏伟. 非饱和膨胀土变形和强度特性的三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(2): 198-201. (ZHAN Liang-tong, NG C W W. Experimental study on mechanical behavior of recompacted unsaturated expansive clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(2): 198-201. (in Chinese))
[4]	李云龙. 土工三轴试验中端部接触和端部约束影响研究[D].大连: 大连理工大学, 2007. (LI Yun-long. Research on influence of end contact and end restriction in soil tri-axial tests[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2007. (in Chinese))
[5]	DUNCAN J M, DUNLOP P. The significance of cap and base restraint[J]. J Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1968, 94(1): 271-290.
[6]	ZHANG H, GARGA V K. Quasi-steady state: a real behavior[J]. Can Geotech J, 1997, 34(5): 749-761.
[7]	BISHOP A W, GREEN E G. The influence of end restraint on the compression strength of a cohesionless soil[J]. Géotechnique, 1965, 15(3): 243-266.
[8]	BLIGHT G E. Shear stress pore pressures in triaxial testing[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Divison, ASCE, 1965, 91(SM6): 25-39.
[9]	ROWE P W. The stress dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact[J]. Proc Royal Society, 1962(269): 500-527.
[10]	陈春霖, 张惠明. 饱和砂土三轴试验中的若干问题[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2000, 22(6): 659-663. (CHEN Chun-lin, ZHANG Hui-ming. Some problems in triaxial test on saturated sands[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(6): 659-663. (in Chinese))
[11]	GARGA V K, ZHANG H. Volume changes in undrained triaxial tests on sands[J]. Can Geotech J, 1997, 34(5): 762-772.
[12]	王助贫, 邵龙潭. 三轴试验土样的端部影响问题研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2003, 24(3): 363-368. (WANG Zhu-pin, SHAO Long-tan. Research on influence of end effect of soil specimens in triaxial tests[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2003, 24(3): 363-368. (in Chinese))
[13]	董建军, 邵龙潭. 考虑端部效应影响的非饱和压实土三轴试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(9): 1937-1944. (DONG Jian-jun, SHAO Long-tan. Study of unsaturated compacted soil considering influence of end effect by triaxial test[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(9): 1937-1944. (in Chinese))
[14]	石露, 李小春. 真三轴试验中的端部摩擦效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(4): 1159-1164. (SHI Lu, LI Xiao-chun. Analysis of end friction effect in true triaxial test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(4): 1159-1164. (in Chinese))
[15]	SL237—1999土工试验规程[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 1999. (SL237—1999 Specification of soil test[S]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 1999. (in Chinese))

施引文献(2)

期刊类型引用(2)

1.	王卫东，高文生，龚维明，林毅峰，刘永超，吴江斌. 基础工程技术的发展与创新. 土木工程学报. 2025(02): 97-117 . 百度学术
2.	舒方法，杨三元，陈韬. 海上风电工程大型构件姿态监测系统开发与应用研究. 港口航道与近海工程. 2024(02): 80-84 . 百度学术