细粒含量及固结应力对饱和砂土动剪切模量和阻尼比影响试验研究

毕昇; 陈国兴; 周正龙; 吴琪

doi:10.11779/CJGE2017S1010

细粒含量及固结应力对饱和砂土动剪切模量和阻尼比影响试验研究 English Version

南京工业大学岩土工程研究所,江苏南京 210009

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（41172258,51438004）; 国家科技; 重大专项（2013Zx06002001-09）

详细信息

作者简介:
毕昇(1991-),男,江苏淮安人,硕士研究生,主要从事土动力学方面研究。E-mail:617855804@qq.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 391
- HTML全文浏览量: 11
- PDF下载量: 257
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-11-27
- 发布日期: 2017-11-19

Experimental study on influences of fines content and consolidation stress on shear modulus and damping ratio of saturated sand

Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, China

摘要

摘要: 土的动剪切模量和阻尼比是描述土体动力特性的两个主要参数。利用美国GCTS公司研制的TSH-100型共振柱试验仪对等压固结条件下饱和砂土的动剪切模量和阻尼比进行测试,研究细粒含量（FC）和固结应力对动剪切模量和阻尼比的影响。试验结果表明：各固结应力水平下,细粒含量对砂土动剪切模量和阻尼比的影响规律趋于一致。当0≤FC≤10%时,随着细粒含量的增加,砂土的动剪切模量逐渐减小,阻尼比则逐渐增大;当10% < FC≤40%时,随着细粒含量的增加,砂土的动剪切模量逐渐增大,阻尼比则逐渐减小。细粒含量相同的砂土,随着固结应力的增大,动剪切模量呈增大趋势,阻尼比呈减小趋势。
- GCTS共振柱 /
- 饱和砂土 /
- 细粒含量 /
- 固结应力 /
- 动剪切模量 /
- 阻尼比
Abstract: The dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio are the two main parameters for describing the dynamic characteristics of soil. The tests on the saturated sand under isotropically consolidation by TSH-100 resonant column apparatus made by GCTS Instruments Ltd. from the USA are performed, and the effects of fines contents (FC) and consolidation stress on the dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio are analyzed. The results show that under different consolidation stress levels, the effects of fines contents on the dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of sand are the same. When 0≤FC≤10%, the dynamic shear modulus of sand decreases and the damping ratio increases with the increase of fines content. When 10%
- GCTS resonant column /
- saturated sand /
- fines content /
- consolidation stress /
- dynamic shear modulus /
- damping ratio

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	LEE W F, ISHIHARA K, CHEN C C. Liquefaction of silty sand-preliminary studies from recent Taiwan, New Zealand and Japan Earthquakes[C]// International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. 2012.
[2]	陈国兴, 金丹丹, 常向东, 等. 最近 20 年地震中场地液化现象的回顾与土体液化可能性的评价准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(10): 2737-2755. (CHEN Guo-xing, JIN Dan-dan, CHANG Xiang-dong, et al. Review of soil liquefaction characteristics during earthquakes of recent twenty years and soil liquefaction susceptibility criteria[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(10): 2737-2755, 2795. (in Chinese))
[3]	CARRARO J A H, BANDINI P, SALGADO R. Liquefaction resistance of clean and nonplastic silty sands based on cone penetration resistance[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(11): 965-976.
[4]	朱建群, 孔令伟, 钟方杰. 粉粒含量对砂土强度特性的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(11): 1647-1652. (ZHU Jian-qun, KONG Ling-wei, ZHONG Fang-jie. Effect of fines content on strength of silty sands[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(11): 1647-1652. (in Chinese))
[5]	BAZIAR M H, SHARAFI H. Assessment of silty sand liquefaction potential using hollow torsional tests-an energy approach[J]. Soil Dynamic Sand Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(7): 857-865.
[6]	周健, 杨永香, 贾敏才, 等. 细粒含量对饱和砂土液化特性的影响[J]. 水利学报, 2009, 140(10): 1184-1188. (ZHOU Jian, YANG Yong-xiang, JIA Min-cai, et al. Effect of fines content on liquefaction properties of saturated silty sands[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 140(10): 1184-1188. (in Chinese))
[7]	王勇, 王艳丽. 细粒含量对饱和砂土动弹性模量和阻尼比的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(9): 2623-2628. (WANG Yong, WANG Yan-li. Study of effects of fines content on dynamic elastic modulus and damping ratio of saturated sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(9): 2623-2628. (in Chinese))
[8]	Abouzar Sadrekarimi. Influence of fines content on lique- fied strength of silty sands[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 55(6): 108-119.
[9]	Darn-Horng Hsiao,Vu To-Anh Phan. Evaluation of static and dynamic properties of sand-fines mixtures through the state and equivalent state parameters[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 84(5): 134-144.
[10]	SL/T 237—1999 土工试验规程[S]. 1999. (SL/T 237—1999 Specification of soil test[S]. 1999. (in Chinese))
[11]	SEED H B, IDRISS I M. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses[R]. Berkely, Calif, 1970.
[12]	袁晓铭, 孙锐, 孙静, 等. 常规土类动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2000, 20(4): 133-139. (YUAN Xiao-ming, SUN Rui, SUN Jing, et al. Laboratory experimental study on dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping ratio of soils[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2000, 20(4): 133-139. (in Chinese))
[13]	王炳辉, 陈国兴, 胡庆兴. 南京细砂动剪切模量和阻尼比的试验研究[J]. 世界地震工程, 2010, 26(3): 7-15. (WANG Bing-hui, CHEN Guo-xing, HU Qing-xing. Experimental research on dynamic shear modulus and damping of Nanjing fine sand[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 26(3): 7-15. (in Chinese))

施引文献(2)

期刊类型引用(2)

1.	王卫东，高文生，龚维明，林毅峰，刘永超，吴江斌. 基础工程技术的发展与创新. 土木工程学报. 2025(02): 97-117 . 百度学术
2.	舒方法，杨三元，陈韬. 海上风电工程大型构件姿态监测系统开发与应用研究. 港口航道与近海工程. 2024(02): 80-84 . 百度学术