考虑土层非线性效应的四川地区场地放大系数模型

姜治军; 胡进军; 张齐; 谢礼立

doi:10.11779/CJGE201609012

考虑土层非线性效应的四川地区场地放大系数模型 English Version

姜治军^1,2,
胡进军^1,2, ,,
张齐^1,2,
谢礼立^1,2,3

1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所,黑龙江哈尔滨150080;
2.中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江哈尔滨150080;
3. 哈尔滨工业大学土木工程学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150090

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展计划（“973”计划）项目（2011CB013601）; 国家自然科学基金项目（51578516,51238012）; 中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项项目（2011B02,2014B06）

详细信息

作者简介:
姜治军(1984- ),男,博士研究生,主要从事基岩衰减关系等方面的科研。E-mail: jzjiem@163.com。

通讯作者:
胡进军，E-mail：hujinjun@iem.ac.cn

中图分类号: TU43
计量
- 文章访问数: 451
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 329
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-07-28
- 发布日期: 2016-09-24

Site amplification factor model for Sichuan region considering nonlinear soil effects

JIANG Zhi-jun^1,2,
HU Jin-jun^1,2, ,,
ZHANG Qi^1,2,
XIE Li-li^1,2,3

1. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin150080, China;
3. School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究四川地区场地放大效应对地震动的影响,选取了该地区105个场地的钻孔资料和897条强震记录,结合强震数据分析和等效线性化计算结果讨论了地震动强度、场地条件对地震动场地放大的影响,建立了考虑土层非线性反应的场地放大系数模型,并探讨了模型在地震动估计中的应用效果。对模型结果的分析表明：当地震动强度较小时,场地放大系数随V_s30增大而减小,减小的幅度与反应谱的周期相关,当周期为0.2 s时,减小得最为显著;当地震动强度较大时,在同一场地上,场地放大系数随地震动强度增大而减小,减小的幅度与反应谱的周期相关,当周期大于1 s时,场地放大系数与地震动强度无关;此外,土层非线性反应对地震动的影响随场地变硬而不明显,当V_s30大于500 m/s时,可忽略这一影响。与只考虑线性场地反应影响的地震动衰减关系相比,利用本文模型建立的地震动衰减关系可显著地减小估计四川地区地震动时的标准差,尤其对于近场短周期地震动减小幅度可达12%。
- 地震动 /
- 场地放大 /
- 土层非线性 /
- 衰减关系 /
- 四川地区
Abstract: To investigate the effect of site amplification on ground motion in Sichuan region, strong motion data and calculated equivalent-linear results are analyzed using 897 strong motion records and 105 shear-wave velocity profiles from the region. Based on the analysis results, the influence of the ground motion intensity and site conditions on site amplification is studied, and site amplification factor model considering nonlinear soil effects is established. Then the application effect of the model to evaluate ground motion is discussed. The results show that the decreasing extent of site amplification factor with the increasing Vs₃₀ is period-dependent at low shaking levels. The decrease is mostly significant at period of 0.2 s. Under high shaking levels the decreasing extent of site amplification factor with the increasing ground motion intensity is spectral period-dependent but the site amplification factor is independent of the ground motion intensity at a periods larger than 1 s. In addition, the soil nonlinearity has less influence on ground motion with the increasing Vs₃₀. When value of Vs₃₀is larger than 500 m/s, the influence can be neglected. In conclusion, compared with attenuation relationship considering only linear soil effects, the standard deviation of ground motion estimates in Sichuan region using the proposed model can be reduced significantly. Especially for the near field and the short period ground motion, the reduction can reach 12%.
- ground motion /
- site amplification /
- soil nonlinearity /
- attenuation relationship /
- Sichuan region

HTML全文

参考文献(29)

[1]	张齐, 胡进军, 谢礼立, 等. 中国西部地区新一代地震动衰减模型[J]. 天津大学学报, 2013, 46(12): 1079-1088. (ZHANG Qi, HU Jin-jun, XIE Li-li, et al. New generation ground motion attenuation model for western China[J]. Journal of Tianjin university, 2013, 46(12):1079-1088. (in Chinese))
[2]	ABRAHAMSON N A, SILVA W J. Summary of the abrahamson & silva nga ground-motion relations[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24(1): 67-97.
[3]	CAMPBELL K W, BOZORGNIA Y. NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA , PGV , PGD , and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24(1): 139-171.
[4]	吕红山, 赵凤新. 适用于中国场地分类的地震动反应谱放大系数[J]. 地震学报, 2007, 29(1): 67-76. (LU Hong-shan, ZHAO Feng-xin. Amplification factors for spectral acceleration appropriate for site category of China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2007, 29(1): 67-76. (in Chinese))
[5]	CHOI Y, STEWART J P. Nonlinear site amplification as function of 30,m shear wave velocity[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2005, 21(1): 1-30.
[6]	WALLING M, SILVA W, ABRAHAMSON N. Nonlinear site amplification factors for constraining the NGA models[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24(1): 243-255.
[7]	KAMAI R, ABRAHAMSON N A, SILVA W J. Nonlinear horizontal site amplification for constraining the NGA-West2 GMPEs[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2014, 30(3): 1223-1240.
[8]	SEYHAN E, STEWART J P. Semi-empirical nonlinear site amplification from NGA-West2 data and simulations[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2014, 30(3): 1241-1256.
[9]	SANDIKKAYA M A, AKKAR S, BARD P Y. A nonlinear site-amplification model for the next Pan-European[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2013, 103(1): 19-32.
[10]	BOORE D M, ATKINSON G M. Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24(1): 99-138.
[11]	CHIOU B S J, YOUNGS R R. NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24(1): 173-215.
[12]	ABRAHAMSON N A, SILVA W J, KAMAI R. Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2014, 30(3): 1025-1055.
[13]	BOORE D M, STEWART J P, SEYHAN E, et al. NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2014, 30(3): 1057-1085.
[14]	CHIOU B S J, YOUNGS R R. Update of the chiou and youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2014, 30(3): 1117-1153.
[15]	CAMPBELL K W, BOZORGNIA Y. NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA , PGV , and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2014, 30(3): 1087-1115.
[16]	姜治军, 胡进军, 谢礼立, 等.中国西部地区场地放大模型[J]. 天津大学学报, 2013, 46(12): 1071-1078. (JIANG Zhi-jun, HU Jin-jun, XIE Li-li, et al. Model of site amplification factor for western China[J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2013, 46(12): 1071-1078. (in Chinese))
[17]	喻畑. 汶川地震区地震动估计经验模型[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2012. (YU Tian. Empirical estimate model for ground motion of Wenchuan earthquake zone[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2012. (in Chinese)).
[18]	卢大伟, 李小军, 崔建文. 汶川中强余震地震动峰值衰减关系[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2010, 18(增刊1): 138-151. (LU Da-wei, LI Xiao-jun, CUI Jian-wen. Ground motion attenuation of the Wenchuan aftershocks[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2010, 18(S1): 138-151. (in Chinese))
[19]	STEWART J P, SEYHAN E. Semi-empirical nonlinear site amplification and its application in NEHRP site factors[R]. Berkeley: College of Engineering University of California, 2013.
[20]	李小军, 彭青, 刘文忠.设计地震动参数确定中的场地影响考虑[J]. 世界地震工程, 2001, 17(4): 34-41. (LI Xiao-jun, PENG Qing, LIU Wen-zhong. Consideration of site effects for determination of design earthquake ground motion parameters[J]. World Information on Earthquake Engineering, 2001, 17(4): 34-41. (in Chinese))
[21]	戚承志, 钱七虎. 核电站抗震研究综述[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2000, 20(3): 76-86. (QI Cheng-zhi, QIAN Qi-hu. Overview of seismic research for nuclear power plant[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2000, 20(3): 76-86. (in Chinese))
[22]	薄景山, 李秀领, 李山有. 场地条件对地震动影响研究的若干进展[J]. 世界地震工程, 2003, 19(2): 11-15. (BO Jing-shan, LI Xiu-ling, LI Shan-you. Some progress of study on the effect of site conditions on ground motion[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2003, 19(2): 11-15. (in Chinese))
[23]	孙茁, 吴建平, 房立华, 等. 利用sPn震相测定芦山Ms7.0级地震余震的震源深度[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(2): 431-440. (SUN Zhuo, WU Jian-ping, FANG Li-hua, et al. Fcal depth determination of aftershocks of Lushan Ms7.0 earthquake from sPn phase[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014, 57(2): 431-440. (in Chinese))
[24]	喻畑, 李小军. 汶川地震余震震源参数及地震动衰减与场地影响参数反演分析[J]. 地震学报, 2012, 34(5): 621-632. (YU Tian, LI Xiao-jun. Inversion of strong data source parameters of aftershocks, attenuation function and average site effect[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2012, 34(5): 624-632. (in Chinese))
[25]	袁晓铭, 孙锐, 孙静, 等. 常规土类动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2000, 20(4): 133-139. (YUAN Xiao-ming, SUN Rui, SUN Jing, et al. Laboratory experimental study on dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping ratio of soils[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2000, 20(4): 133-139. (in Chinese))
[26]	廖振鹏, 李大华. 设计地震反应谱的双参数标定模型[M]// 地震小区划—理论与实践. 北京: 地震出版社, 1989: 196-206. (LIAO Zhen-peng, LI Da-hua. Theoretics and practice of the study on Seismic Microzonation[M]// Two-parameter Calibration Model for Seismic Response Spectrum. Beijing: Earthquake Publish Company, 1989: 196-206. (in Chinese))
[27]	郭晓云, 薄景山, 巴文辉.汶川地震反应谱特征周期统计分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2013, 33(2): 55-59. (GUO Xiao-yun, BO Jing-shan, BA Wen-hui. Statistical analysis of characteristic period of response spectrum based on Wenchuan strong ground motion[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2013, 33(2): 55-59. (in Chinese))
[28]	KAKLAMANOS J, BRADLEY B A, THOMPSON E M, et al.Critical parameters affecting bias and variability in site-response analyses using KiK-net Downhole array data[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2013, 103: 1733-1749.
[29]	KIM B, HASHASH Y M A. Site response analysis using downhole array recordings during the March 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake and the effect of long-duration ground motions[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2013, 29(S): 37-54.

施引文献(10)

期刊类型引用(8)

1.	王炜，窦锦钟，袁青云，韩磊，孙旻. 抽水蓄能电站绿色施工技术. 施工技术(中英文). 2024(18): 129-133+153 . 百度学术
2.	张昕阳，申玉生，常铭宇，王浩鱇，潘笑海，王岩岩. 基于GA-BP神经网络的隧道围岩相似材料配合比设计. 现代隧道技术. 2024(06): 82-91 . 百度学术
3.	廖光明. 胶凝砂砾石坝抗滑稳定可靠度分析方法研究. 湖南水利水电. 2023(02): 22-25 . 百度学术
4.	丁泽霖，王肖楠，张宏洋，王婧，包闯. 复杂地基重力坝与胶凝砂砾石坝变形破坏对比分析. 工程科学与技术. 2023(04): 197-206 . 百度学术
5.	杨锐婷，万露. 折线形胶凝砂砾石坝三维静力有限元分析. 吉林水利. 2023(07): 14-20 . 百度学术
6.	丁泽霖，徐良杰，王肖楠. 基于多元优化的百米级胶凝砂砾石坝设计方法. 水力发电学报. 2023(12): 119-131 . 百度学术
7.	杨玉坚，刘艳华，陈雪冬. 胶凝砂砾石坝导流设计方法研究. 水利建设与管理. 2023(S1): 35-39 . 百度学术
8.	刘欢. 基于AutoBANK的流固耦合场沙田水库坝体渗流变形特征研究. 水利科学与寒区工程. 2022(08): 26-30 . 百度学术