• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

砾性土液化特性与机理

曹振中, 刘荟达, 袁晓铭

曹振中, 刘荟达, 袁晓铭. 砾性土液化特性与机理[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(7): 1165-1174. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201607001
引用本文: 曹振中, 刘荟达, 袁晓铭. 砾性土液化特性与机理[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(7): 1165-1174. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201607001
CAO Zhen-zhong, LIU Hui-da, YUAN Xiao-ming. Liquefaction characteristics and mechanism of gravelly soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(7): 1165-1174. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201607001
Citation: CAO Zhen-zhong, LIU Hui-da, YUAN Xiao-ming. Liquefaction characteristics and mechanism of gravelly soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(7): 1165-1174. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201607001

砾性土液化特性与机理  English Version

基金项目: 中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(2016B01); 国家自然科学基金项目(51208477,41272357)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    曹振中(1982- ),男,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土地震工程方面的研究。E-mail: iemczz@163.com。

Liquefaction characteristics and mechanism of gravelly soils

  • 摘要: 2008年汶川地震之前,全球历史地震中砾性土液化实例不足10例,远远少于砂土液化的数量和规模,实际地震中砾性土液化的发生较为罕见,必然存在较为严格的发生条件,在土性条件、地震荷载、埋藏条件等均满足时才有可能发生。以2008年汶川地震大量砾性土液化为背景,详细分析了砾性土液化实例的水文与工程地质条件、渗透性能与排水边界条件,选取了典型砾性土液化场地并人工探坑获取砾性土试样,开展了试样直径为150 mm的动三轴和振动台对比试验。结果表明:①橡皮膜嵌入效应可以忽略或者进行有效消除后,相同相对密实度下砾性土、砂土的抗液化强度较为接近;②采用Seed等的孔压计算模型,随着动应力水平的逐渐增大,归一化的砾性土残余孔压比向上突起,增长模型趋向于A型曲线;③全球其他历史地震和2008年汶川地震砾性土液化实例中,基本上存在砾性土渗透系数较低或者排水边界条件受阻的情况;④砾性土符合无黏性散粒土体(包括砂土)发生液化的一般机理解释,但是,砾性土产生孔隙水压力上升、有效应力下降的现象,需要具备两个必要条件:①振动作用足以使砾性土的结构发生破坏而振密或土颗粒压碎,产生的剪应变只有大于门槛剪应变时(约0.02%),孔压才会进一步发展,剪应变只有大于一定程度时(约0.1%),孔压才有可能迅速增长直至达到上覆压力;②只有在不排水条件或排水通道不畅通的条件下,砾性土场地才有可能发生液化。
    Abstract: Liquefaction of gravelly soils is an unusual phenomenon during earthquake. Not more than 10 case histories are reported before “2008 Wenchuan earthquake”. The occurrence of gravelly soils has to meet strict conditions, including property of soils, intensity of earthquake shaking and burial conditions. Based on widespread liquefaction of gravelly soils during “2008 Wenchuan earthquake”, the hydraulic and geological background, permeability and drainage conditions of liquefied sites of gravelly soils are analyzed, and a typical case is selected to trench, and gravelly samples at liquefied layer are collected for shaking table tests and triaxial tests on specimens with diameter of 150 mm. The results reveal: (1) If the effect of membrane compliance is eliminated or neglected, the liquefaction resistance of gravelly soils is about identical to that of sand. (2) Using the pore water pressure model of Seed (1976), the normalized accumulative pore water pressure bulges up with the increasing level of cyclic stress. (3) For the reported case histories and liquefied situations during “2008 Wenchuan earthquake”, the drainage pass is almost clogged or the permeability of liquefied layer is low. (4) The increasing pore water pressure of loose gravelly soils and the decreasing effective stress under load of cyclic stress have two basic requirements. One is that the level of cyclic stress should be high enough to crush the soil particles or to destruct the structure of soil particles so that the gravelly soils become denser. As shear strain is up to the threshold strain of 0.02%, the pore water pressure begins to be generated, until the shear strain is greater than 0.1%, and the pore water pressure develops quickly even up to the total pressure. The other is that the drainage pass should be clogged or the permeability is low.
  • [1] 地球科学大词典编委会. 地球科学大词典[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2005. (Earth Science Dictionary Committee. Earth science dictionary[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2005. (in Chinese))
    [2] 张克绪, 谢君斐.土动力学[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 1980. (ZHANG Ke-xu, XIE Jun-fei. Soil dynamics[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1980. (in Chinese))
    [3] 徐 斌, 孔宪京, 邹德高, 等. 饱和砂砾料液化后应力与变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(1): 103-106. (XU Bin, KONG Xian-jing, ZOU De-gao, et al. Laboratory study on behaviour of static properties of saturated sand-gravel after liquefaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(1): 103-106. (in Chinese))
    [4] MARK Evans D, SEED H B. Undrained cyclic triaxial testing of gravels-the effect of membrane compliance[R]. California: University of California, Berkeley. UCB/EERC-87/08, 1987.
    [5] MARK Evans D, ZHOU Sheng-ping. Liquefaction behavior of sand-gravel composites[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1995, 121(3): 287-298.
    [6] WONG R T, SEED H B, CHAN C K. Liquefaction of gravelly soils under cyclic loading conditions[R]. California: University of California, Berkeley. UCB/EERC-74/11, 1974.
    [7] SIDDIQI F H, SEED R B, CHAN C K, et al. Strenght evaluation of coarse-grained soils[R]. California: University of California, Berkeley. UCB/EERC-87/22, 1987.
    [8] 王昆耀, 常亚屏, 陈 宁. 饱和砂砾料液化特性的试验研究[J]. 水利学报, 2000(2): 37-41. (WANG Kun-yao, CHANG Ya-ping, CHEN Ning. Experimental study on liquefaction characteristics of saturated sandy gravel[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2000(2): 37-41. (in Chinese))
    [9] 汪闻韶, 常亚屏, 左秀泓. 饱和砂砾料在振动和往返加荷下的液化特性[M]// 水利水电科学研究院论文集第23集. 北京: 水利出版社, 1986: 195-203. (WANG Wen-shao, CHANG Ya-ping, ZOU Xiu-hong. Liquefaction characteristics of saturated sand-gravels under vibration and cyclic loading[M]// Volume 23 Collected Papers of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research. Beijing: China Waterpower Press, 1986: 195-203. (in Chinese))
    [10] 王志华, 周恩全, 吕 丛. 等. 基于流动性的饱和砂砾土液化机理[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(10): 1816-1822. (WANG Zhi-hua, ZHOU En-quan, LÜ Cong. Liquefaction mechanism of saturated gravelly soils based on flowing property[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(10): 1816-1822. (in Chinese))
    [11] The Committee on Soil Dynamics of the Geotechnical Engineering Division. Definition of terms related to Liquefaction[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1978, 104(GT9): 1197-1200.
    [12] 刘 颖, 谢君斐. 砂土震动液化[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1984. (LIU Ying, XIE Jun-fei. Sand seismic liquefaction[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1984. (in Chinese))
    [13] 汪闻韶. 土的动力强度和液化特性[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 1997. (WANG Wen-shao. Soil dynamic strength and liquefaction properties[M]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 1997. (in Chinese))
    [14] 石兆吉, 王兰民. 土壤动力特性. 液化势及危害评价[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 1999. (SHI Zhao-jie, WANG Lan-min. Soil dynamic properties, liquefaction potential, and liquefaction-induced damage[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1999. (in Chinese))
    [15] 王 刚, 张建民. 地震液化问题研究进展[J]. 力学进展, 2007, 37(4): 575-589. (WANG Gang, ZHANG Jian-min. Recent advances in seismic liquefaction research[J]. Advanced in Mechanics, 2007, 37(4): 575-589. (in Chinese))
    [16] 陈国兴. 岩土地震工程学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007. (CHENG Guo-xin. Geotechnical earthquake engineering[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2007. (in Chinese))
    [17] NANI Banerjee G, BOLTON Seed H, CLARENCE Chan K. Cyclic behavior of dense coarse-grained materials in relation to the seismic stability of dams[R]. California: University of California, Berkeley UCB/EERC, 79/13, 1979.
    [18] BISHOP A W, GREEN G E. The influence of end restraint on the compression strength of cohesionless soil[J]. Géotechnique, 1965(15): 244-266.
    [19] SEED H B, MARTIN P P, LYSMER J. Pore water pressure changes during soil liquefaction[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1976, 102(4): 323-346.
    [20] 张建民, 谢定义. 饱和砂土振动孔隙水压力增长的实用算法[J]. 水利学报, 1991, 9(8): 45-51. (ZHANG Jian-min, XIE Ding-yi. A pragmatic method for calculating the excess pore water pressure generation of saturated sand under cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1991, 9(8): 45-51. (in Chinese))
    [21] ISHIHARA K, LYSMER J, YASUDO S, et al. Prediction of liquefaction in sand deposits during earthquake[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1976, 16(1): 1-16.
    [22] COX R B. Development of a direct test method for dynamically assessing the liquefaction resistance of soils in situ[D]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 2006.
    [23] DOBRY R, LADD R S, YOKEL F Y, et al. Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method[R]. Washington: National Bureau of Standards Building Science Series, 1982: 138.
    [24] 刘令瑶, 李桂芬, 丙东屏. 密云水库白河主坝保护层地震破坏及砂料振动液化特性[M]// 水利水电科学研究院论文集第8集(岩土工程). 北京: 水利出版社, 1982: 46-54. (LIU Ling-yao, LI Gui-fen, BING Dong-ping. Earthquake damage of Baihe Dam and liquefaction characteristics of sand and gravel materials[M]// Volume 8 Collected Papers of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research. Beijing: China Waterpower Press, 1982: 46-54. (in Chinese))
    [25] DAS B M. Principles of geotechnical engineering[M]. 7th ed. Stanford: Cengage Learning, 2009.
    [26] 中国科学院工程力学研究所.海城地震震害[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1979. (Institute of Engineering Mechanics. The Haicheng earthquake damages[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1979. (in Chinese))
    [27] SIROVICH L. Repetitive liquefaction at a gravelly site and liquefaction in overconsolidated sands[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36(4): 23-34.
    [28] ANDRUS R D, YOUD T L, CARTER R R. Geotechnical evaluation of a liquefaction induced lateral spread, Thousand Springs Valley, Idaho[C]// 22nd Symposium on Engineering Geology and Soils Engineering. Idaho, 1986: 383-402.
    [29] YEGIAN M K, GHAHRAMAN V G, HARUTIUNYAN R N. Liquefaction and embankment failure case histories, 1988 Armenia Earthquake[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(3): 581-596.
    [30] KOKUSHO T, TANAKA Y, KAWAI, et al. Case study of rock debris avalanche gravel liquefied during 1993 Hokkaido- Nansei-Oki Earthquake[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1995, 35(3): 83-95.
    [31] HATANAKA M, UCHIDA A, OHARA J. Liquefaction characteristics of a gravelly fill liquefied during the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1997, 37(3): 107-115.
    [32] LIN P, CHANG C, CHANG W. Characterization of liquefaction resistance in gravelly soil: large hammer penetration test and shear wave velocity approach[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 24: 675-687.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  573
  • HTML全文浏览量:  2
  • PDF下载量:  554
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-08-23
  • 发布日期:  2016-07-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回