高级搜索
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

浅埋隧道施工扰动下含空洞地层破坏演化规律试验研究

张成平, 张旭, 李贺, 张顶立

张成平, 张旭, 李贺, 张顶立. 浅埋隧道施工扰动下含空洞地层破坏演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(2): 263-270. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602009
引用本文: 张成平, 张旭, 李贺, 张顶立. 浅埋隧道施工扰动下含空洞地层破坏演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(2): 263-270. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602009
shu
ZHANG Cheng-ping, ZHANG Xu, LI He, ZHANG Ding-li. Model tests on failure laws of ground with voids induced by shallow tunnelling[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 263-270. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602009
Citation: ZHANG Cheng-ping, ZHANG Xu, LI He, ZHANG Ding-li. Model tests on failure laws of ground with voids induced by shallow tunnelling[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 263-270. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602009
shu

浅埋隧道施工扰动下含空洞地层破坏演化规律试验研究  English Version

  • 北京交通大学城市地下工程教育部重点实验室,北京 100044

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51378002）; 新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目（NCET-12-0770）
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张成平(1975- ),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: chpzhang@bjtu.edu.cn。

Model tests on failure laws of ground with voids induced by shallow tunnelling

  • MOE Key Lab of Urban Underground Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

摘要

    摘要
  • 摘要: 地层中隐伏空洞的存在是浅埋隧道施工安全事故的重要诱因。通过模型试验,系统研究了浅埋隧道施工扰动下隐伏空洞位置和数量变化对地层破坏的影响规律。模型试验结果表明：①浅埋隧道施工扰动下,含空洞地层较无空洞地层的破坏进程更为快速,破坏程度更为剧烈,导致的地面塌陷范围更广。②浅埋隧道邻近地层空洞施工过程中,空洞往往会成为隧道周边围岩破坏的起点,施工前对邻近的地层空洞进行有效处理是防控安全事故的基础。③地层空洞位置和数量的变化会显著改变围岩破裂面角度和破裂面对称性等几何特征,使得地层破坏的发展演化规律更为复杂。④当地层空洞位于隧道斜上方时,空洞对侧（无空洞一侧）区域地表裂缝的出现时间要早于空洞一侧区域,且空洞对侧区域地表裂缝的数量和尺寸均明显大于空洞一侧区域,这也为浅埋隧道施工过程中通过观测地表裂缝分布来推断地层空洞的位置提供了依据。
    Abstract: The void existing in the ground is an important inducement for safety accidents in shallow tunnelling. Based on model tests, the failure laws of ground with voids at different locations and with different numbers are studied. The results show that: (1) The shallow tunnelling in the ground with voids results in more rapid failure process, more severe failure degree and larger surface collapse of the surrounding rock than that in the ground without voids. (2) When the tunneling is adjacent to the voids, the failures of the surrounding rock are more likely to start from the voids. Therefore, it’s important to take effective measures to deal with the voids before the tunnelling to prevent safety accidents. (3) The location and quantity of voids significantly change the geometrical characters of slip planes in the surrounding rock, such as the angle and the symmetry, which makes the failure laws of the ground with voids more complicated than those of the ground without voids. (4) When the void is located diagonally above the tunnel, the first ground surface crack at the opposite side of the void appears earlier than that at the other side. Moreover, the quantity and size of ground surface cracks at the opposite side of the void are obviously larger than those at the other side. It may provide significant information for deducing the location of a void by observing the distribution of ground surface cracks during shallow tunneling.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(19)
  • [1] 张顶立, 张成平, 候艳娟, 等. 北京地铁施工事故案例分析[R]. 北京: 北京市轨道交通建设管理有限公司, 北京交通大学, 2006. (ZHANG Ding-li, ZHANG Cheng-ping, HOU Yan-juan, et al. Case analysis of safety accidents in Beijing subway construction[R]. Beijing: Beijing Metro Construction Management Company Limited, Beijing Jiaotong University, 2006. (in Chinese))
    [2] 张成平, 张顶立, 王梦恕, 等. 城市隧道施工诱发的地面塌陷灾变机制及其控制[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(增刊1): 303-309. (ZHANG Cheng-ping, ZHANG Ding-li, WANG Meng-shu, et al. Catastrophe mechanism and control technology of ground collapse induced by urban tunneling[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(S1): 303-309. (in Chinese))
    [3] 冯 剑, 漆泰岳, 王 睿, 等. 砂卵石地层空洞的安全性定量评价方法浅析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2013, 9(增刊2): 2058-2063. (FENG Jian, QI Tai-yue, WANG Rui, et al. Analysis on quantitative evaluation of the safety of cavity in sandy pebble stratum[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2013: 9(S2): 2058-2063. (in Chinese))
    [4] 李倩倩, 张顶立, 房 倩. 含空洞地层初始破坏的复变函数解析研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(11): 2110-2117. (LI Qian-qian, ZHANG Ding-li, FANG Qian. Analytic solution to initial damage of cavern strata by complex function method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(11): 2110-2117. (in Chinese))
    [5] 张顶立, 李倩倩, 房 倩, 等. 隧道施工影响下城市复杂地层的变形机制及预测方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(12): 2504-2516. (ZHANG Ding-li, LI Qian-qian, FANG Qian, et al. Deformation mechanism and prediction method for tunneling in complex urban ground conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(12): 2504-2516. (in Chinese))
    [6] 陶连金, 袁 松, 安军海. 城市道路地下空洞病害发展机理及对路面塌陷的影响[J]. 黑龙江科技大学学报, 2015, 25(3): 289-293. (TAO Lian-jin, YUAN Song, AN Jun-hai. Development mechanism of cavity damage under urban roads and its influence on road surface subsidence[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang University of Science & Technology, 2015, 25(3): 289-293. (in Chinese))
    [7] CHAMBON P, Corté J F. Shallow tunnels in cohesionless soil: stability of tunnel face[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(7): 1148-1165.
    [8] KAMATA H, MASHIMO H. Centrifuge model test of tunnel face reinforcement by bolting[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2003, 18(2/3): 205-212.
    [9] MEGUID M A, SAADA O, NUNES M A, et al. Physical modeling of tunnels in soft ground: a review[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(2): 185-198.
    [10] IDINGER G, AKLIK P, WU W, et al. Centrifuge model test on the face stability of shallow tunnel[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2011, 6(2): 105-117.
    [11] 刘泉维, 杨忠年. 泥水平衡盾构开挖面稳定性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(8): 2255-2260. (LIU Quan-wei, YANG Zhong-nian. Model test research on excavation face stability of slurry balanced shield in permeable sand layers[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(8): 2255-2260. (in Chinese))
    [12] STERPI D, CIVIDINI A. A physical and numerical investigation on the stability of shallow tunnels in strain softening media[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2004, 37(4): 277-298.
    [13] KIRSCH A. Experimental investigation of the face stability of shallow tunnels in sand[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2010, 5(1): 43-62.
    [14] 房 倩, 张顶立, 王毅远, 等. 圆形洞室围岩破坏模式模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(3): 564-571. (FANG Qian, ZHANG Ding-li, WONG Louis Ngai Yuen, et al. Model test study of failure modes of surrounding rock for circular caverns[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(3): 564-571. (in Chinese))
    [15] 张成平, 韩凯航, 张顶立, 等. 城市软弱围岩隧道塌方特征及演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(12): 2433-2442. (ZHANG Cheng-ping, HAN Kai-hang, ZHANG Ding-li, et al. Test study of collapse characteristics of tunnels in soft ground in urban areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(12): 2433-2442. (in Chinese))
    [16] 张成平, 岳跃敬, 蔡 义. 管线渗漏水范围对浅埋隧道围岩变形和破坏的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(2): 392-400. (ZHANG Cheng-ping, YUE Yue-jing, CAI Yi. Influence of the range of pipeline leakage on ground deformation and failure during shallow tunnelling[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(2): 392-400. (in Chinese))
    [17] 周 毅, 李术才, 李利平, 等. 地下工程流-固耦合试验新技术及其在充填型岩溶管道突水模型试验中的应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(7): 1232-1240. (ZHOU Yi, LI Shu-cai, LI Li-ping, et al. New technology for fluid-solid coupling tests of underground engineering and its application in experimental simulation of water inrush in filled-type karst conduit[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(7): 1232-1240. (in Chinese))
    [18] 袁文忠. 相似理论与静力学模型试验[M]. 成都: 西南交通大学出版社, 1998. (YUAN Wen-zhong. Similar theory and statics model test[M]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University Press, 1998. (in Chinese))
    [19] 牛永贤, 朱永全, 叶朝良. 石家庄六线隧道模型试验相似材料研究[J]. 石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 24(4): 69-73. (NIU Yong-xian, ZHU Yong-quan, YE Chao-liang. Research on analogous material of model test for Six Line Tunnel in Shijiazhuang[J]. Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (Natural Science), 2011, 24(4): 69-73. (in Chinese))
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献(41)

  • 期刊类型引用(25)

    1. 王朋飞，祝壮，孙中光，曲越，张衡，李培现. 长壁工作面开采时间间隔对倾向主断面地表沉陷的影响研究. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2025(02): 282-293 . 百度学术
    2. 丁星丞，李培现，康新亮，王明亮，张涛，郝登程. 融合概率积分法与SBAS-InSAR的开采沉陷计算方法. 矿业科学学报. 2025(01): 48-56 . 百度学术
    3. 韩春鹏，杜超，史梁，祖发金，柴晓鹤. 老采空区地表沉降预测合理监测模式分析. 工程勘察. 2024(02): 48-53 . 百度学术
    4. 张梦华. 羊东矿保护煤柱开采地表变形研究. 煤炭与化工. 2024(03): 27-29+33 . 百度学术
    5. 郭庆彪，余庆，郑美楠，罗锦. 测线布设形态与测点缺失对采煤沉陷预计参数反演的影响. 煤田地质与勘探. 2024(06): 57-68 . 百度学术
    6. 孙述海，王文斌，齐树明，姜佃卿，孙玥，岳伟佳. 新阳煤矿三、四采区地表移动变形规律研究. 资源信息与工程. 2024(04): 59-63 . 百度学术
    7. 张玮，陈迪，袁利伟，郭庆，李晨洋，李彧，李袁松，李春辉，陈明辉. 基于概率积分法的露地联采地表移动影响范围划定分析. 采矿技术. 2024(05): 12-20 . 百度学术
    8. 孙志豪，徐良骥，刘潇鹏. 一种基于分段加权赋参的厚松散层矿区沉陷预计方法. 金属矿山. 2024(11): 132-141 . 百度学术
    9. 王文才，吴周康，高小雷，王鹏. 非充分采动条件下地表移动概率积分法预测. 煤炭技术. 2023(06): 1-4 . 百度学术
    10. 杨晓玉，朱晓峻. 基于稳健遗传算法的矿山开采沉陷预计参数反演. 金属矿山. 2023(08): 237-244 . 百度学术
    11. 滕永佳，阎跃观，郭伟，姜岩，胡耀东. 不规则工作面开采地表沉陷线积分预计方法. 矿业科学学报. 2022(01): 82-88 . 百度学术
    12. 胡辉东，李贤庆，陈纯芳，刘洋，张博翔. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区J58井区盒一段甜点储层特征及主控因素. 矿业科学学报. 2022(01): 71-88 . 百度学术
    13. 程桦，张亮亮，姚直书，彭世龙，郭龙辉. 厚松散层薄基岩非对称开采井筒偏斜机理. 煤炭学报. 2022(01): 102-114 . 百度学术
    14. 张劲满，阎跃观，李杰卫，徐瑞瑞，王芷馨，张坤，岳彩亚. 概率积分预计参数的ENN优化算法. 金属矿山. 2022(05): 170-176 . 百度学术
    15. 周佳薇，吴鑫，刘峰. 煤矿综放开采地表移动规律. 测绘技术装备. 2022(02): 130-134 . 百度学术
    16. 黄金中，王磊，李靖宇，蒋创，滕超群，李忠，李世保. 群智能优化算法反演概率积分参数的性能比较与分析. 金属矿山. 2022(08): 173-181 . 百度学术
    17. 丁一，邓念东，姚婷，刘东海，尚慧. 地质采矿条件对铁路路基沉陷预测影响研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2022(07): 135-145 . 百度学术
    18. 李勇，贺鑫，李培现，王炳，杨中辉，张芷祺，杨可明. 煤矿地表塌陷区天眼巡查监测系统设计及应用. 煤炭工程. 2022(12): 157-163 . 百度学术
    19. 叶伟，徐良骥，张坤. 概率积分法参数反演的SAAFC模型. 金属矿山. 2021(04): 139-148 . 百度学术
    20. 李靖宇，王磊，朱尚军，滕超群，江克贵. 基于狼群算法的概率积分法模型参数反演方法研究. 中国矿业. 2020(10): 102-109 . 百度学术
    21. 陈兴达，余学祥，池深深，汪涛，陈卫卫. 基于多种群遗传算法的概率积分法参数反演. 煤矿安全. 2020(11): 50-54+60 . 百度学术
    22. 曲相屹，李学良. 长壁开采工作面地表岩移参数求取方法分析. 水力采煤与管道运输. 2019(02): 39-41 . 百度学术
    23. 李学良. 建筑物开采损害鉴定方法评价及应用. 矿山测量. 2019(04): 9-12 . 百度学术
    24. 袁鑫，王远坚，郑健，李鹏宇，胡重戎，姜岩. 基于弹性薄板理论的地表下沉预计模型. 金属矿山. 2019(10): 37-41 . 百度学术
    25. 黄晖，池深深，韩必武，刘可胜. 基于PCA-BP神经网络的概率积分法参数算法研究. 黑龙江科学. 2019(24): 1-5 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(16)

    • 资源附件(0)
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 41
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-03-24
  • 发布日期:  2016-02-24

目录

摘要
HTML全文
    参考文献(19)
    相关文章
    施引文献
    资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    版权所有 © 2010水利部交通部国家能源局南京水利科学研究院 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    编辑部地址：南京市虎踞关34号《岩土工程学报》编辑部邮编：210024电话：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn