三维应力空间下改进状态变量的上下负荷面模型及其数值实现

马少坤; 潘柏羽; 何建兴; 赵乃峰; 江杰; 刘莹

doi:10.11779/CJGE201512017

三维应力空间下改进状态变量的上下负荷面模型及其数值实现 English Version

马少坤^{1, 2},
潘柏羽^{1, 2},
何建兴^{1, 2},
赵乃峰³,
江杰^1,2,,
刘莹^{1, 2}

1. 广西大学土木建筑工程学院,广西南宁 530004;
2. 广西大学工程防灾与结构安全重点实验室,广西南宁 530004;
3. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51068002,41362016）; 广西岩土力学与工程重点实验室课题项目（13-KF-02,14-KF-03）

详细信息

作者简介:
马少坤(1972- ),男,湖南湘潭人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地下工程的研究与教学工作。E-mail: mashaokun@sina.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 317
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 268
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-04-21
- 发布日期: 2015-12-19

Super-subloading surface model with improved state variables in 3D stress space and its numerical implementation

MA Shao-kun^{1, 2},
PAN Bai-yu^{1, 2},
HE Jian-xing^{1, 2},
ZHAO Nai-feng³,
JIANG Jie^1,2,,
LIU Ying^{1, 2}

1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China;
3. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

摘要

摘要: 为准确描述结构性土、超固结土的复杂弹塑性力学行为,对上下负荷面模型中的超固结状态变量R与结构性状态变量R^*的演化规律进行改进,运用Sheng建议的破坏准则把模型的应用范围拓宽到三维应力空间,建立了三维应力空间下改进状态变量的上下负荷面模型。详细介绍了该模型隐式应力更新算法的数值实现过程,编制了对应的接口子程序,实现了对有限元软件的二次开发,并通过一系列数值模拟验证了模型的合理性、程序的精度与稳定性。最后应用本文模型模拟Boom黏土和Fujinomori 黏土并与试验数据对比,结果表明,模型能够准确描述结构性土、超固结土的力学特征。
- 超固结 /
- 结构 /
- 上下负荷面 /
- 三维应力空间 /
- 材料子程序
Abstract: A 3D improved super-subloading surface model is established to discribe the complex behaviors of overconsolidated and structured soil precisely. By comparing with those of the existing super-subloading surface models, the evolution of overconsolidation state variable R and structural state variable R* in this model is ameliorated. Moreover, the realm of the model is expanded to 3D stress space as the shape of yield condition in π plane is assumed to be sleeked by utilizing the failure criterion suggested by Sheng. Then the procedure of implicit stress-update algorithm is introduced, and the model is realized in finite element software by subroutine. Subsquently, the rationalities of the model and the subroutine are verified in a series of numerical simulations. Finally, Boom clay and Fujinomori clay are simulated, and the numercial simulation results are compared with the test data. The comparison shows that the proposed model can describe the characteristics of overconsolidated and structured soil accurately.
- overconsolidation /
- structure /
- super-subloading surface /
- 3D stress space /
- subroutine

HTML全文

参考文献(37)

[1]	LEROUEIL S, VAUGHAN P R. The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks[J]. Géotechnique, 1990, 40(3): 467-488.
[2]	TATSUOKA F, SANTUCCI DE MAGISTRIS F, HAYANO K, et al. Some new aspects of time effects on the stress-strain behaviour of stiff geomaterials: Keynote lecture[C]// Proc of Second Int Conf on Hard Soils and Soft Rocks. Napoli, 1998: 1285-1371.
[3]	TAVENAS F, LEROUEIL S. Laboratory and in situ stress-strain-time behavior of soft clays: a state of the art[C]// International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering of Soft Soils. Mexico City, 1987, 2: 3-48.
[4]	MESRI G. Discussion of New design procedure for stability of soft clays[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1975(1): 409-412.
[5]	ROSCOE K H, SCHOFIELD A N, THURAIRA A. Yielding of clay in states wetter than critical[J]. Géotechnique, 1963, 13(3): 211-240.
[6]	ROSCOE K H, BURLAND J B. On the generalized stress-strain behavior of ‘wet’ clay[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968: 535-609.
[7]	ASAOKA A, NAKANO M, NODA T. Superloading yield surface concept for highly structured soil behavior[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2000, 40(2): 99-110.
[8]	ASAOKA A, NAKANO M, NODA T, et al. Delayed compression/consolidation of naturally clay due to degradation of soil structure[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2000, 40(3): 75-85.
[9]	YAMAKAWA Y, HASHIGUCHI K, IKEDA K. Implicit stress-update algorithm for isotropic Cam-clay model based on the subloading surface concept at finite strains[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2010, 26(5): 634-658.
[10]	MRÓZ Z. On the description of anisotropic workhardening[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1967, 15(3): 163-175.
[11]	MRÓZ Z. An attempt to describe the behavior of metals under cyclic loads using a more general work-hardening model[J]. Acta Mechanica, 1969, 7(2): 199-212.
[12]	IWAN W D. On a class of models for the yielding behavior of continuous and composite systems[J]. ASME J Appl Mech, 1967, 34(3): 612-617.
[13]	DAFALIAS Y F, POPOV E P. A model on nonlinearly hardening materials for complex loading[J]. Acta Mechanica, 1975, 21(3): 173-192.
[14]	KRIEG R D. A practical two surface plasticity theory[J]. ASME J Appl Mech, 1975, 42(3): 641-646.
[15]	MRÓZ Z, NORRIS V A, ZIENKIEWICZ O C. An anisotropic critical state model for soils subject to cyclic loading[J]. Géotechnique, 1981, 31(4):451-469.
[16]	HASHIGUCHI K, UENO M. Elastoplastic constitutive laws of granular material[C]//Constitutive Equations of Soils, JSSMFE. Tokyo, 1977.
[17]	HASHIGUCHI K. Constitutive equations of elastoplastic materials with elastoplastic transition[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1980, 47(2): 266-272.
[18]	HASHIGUCHI K. Subloading surface model in unconventional plasticity[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1989, 25(8): 917-945.
[19]	HASHIGUCHI K. Fundamental requirements and formulation of elastoplastic constitutive equations with tangential plasticity[J]. Int J Plasticity, 1993, 9(5): 525-549.
[20]	HASHIGUCHI K. Mechanical requirements and structures of cyclic plasticity models[J]. Int J Plasticity, 1993, 9(6): 721-748.
[21]	YAO Y P, HOU W, ZHOU A N. A constitutive model for overconsolidated clays based on the Hvorslev envelope[J]. Science in China (Ser E), 2008, 51(2): 179-191.
[22]	OZAKI S, HIKIDA K, HASHIGUCHI K. Elastoplastic formulation for friction with orthotropic anisotropy and rotational hardening[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2012, 49(3/4): 648-657.
[23]	LIU M D, CARTER J P. Virgin compression of structured soils[J]. Géotechnique, 1999, 49(1): 43-57.
[24]	LIU M D, CARTER J P. Modelling the destructuring of soils during virgin compression[J]. Géotechnique, 2000, 50(4): 479-483.
[25]	LIU M D, CARTER J P. A structured Cam Clay model[J]. Géotechnique, 2002, 50(4): 479-483.
[26]	HORPIBULSUK S, LIU M D, LIYANAPATHIRANA D S, et al. Behaviour of cemented clay simulated via the theoretical framework of Structured Cam Clay model[J]. Comput Geotech, 2010: 37(1/2):1-9.
[27]	SUEBSUK J, HORPIBULSUK S, LIU M D. Modified Structured Cam Clay: A generalised critical state model for destructured, naturally structured and artificially structured clays[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2010, 37(7/8): 956-968.
[28]	SHENG D, SLOAN S W, YU H S. Aspects of finite element implementation of critical state models[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2000, 26(2): 185-196.
[29]	YAMAKAWA Y, HASHIGUCHI K, IKEDA K. Implicit stress-update algorithm for isotropic Cam-clay model based on the subloading surface concept at finite strains[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2010, 26(5): 634-658.
[30]	ZHU H H, YE B, CAI Y C, et al. An elasto-viscoplastic model for soft rock around tunnels considering overconsolidation and structure effects[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2013, 50: 6-16.
[31]	HØEG K, DYVIK R, SANDBÆKKEN G. Strength of undisturbed versus reconstituted silt and silty sand specimens[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2000, 126(7): 606-617.
[32]	刘恩龙, 沈珠江. 不同应力路径下结构性土的力学特性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(10): 2058-2064. (LIU En-long, SHEN Zhu-jiang. Mechanical behavior of structured soils under different stress paths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(10): 2058-2064. (in Chinese))
[33]	龚晓南, 熊传祥, 项可祥, 等. 黏土结构性对其力学性质的影响及形成原因分析[J]. 水利学报, 2000, 22(10): 43-47. (GONG Xiao-nan, XIONG Chuan-xiang, XIANG Ke-xiang, et al. The formation of clay structure and its influence on mechanical characteristics of clay[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2000, 22(10): 43-47. (in Chinese))
[34]	张诚厚. 两种结构性土的土工特性[J]. 水利水运科学研究, 1983(4): 65-71. (ZHANG Cheng-hou. Engineering quality of two kinds of structured clay[J]. Journal of Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, 1983(4): 65-71. (in Chinese))
[35]	王常明, 张先伟. 软土结构性对次固结系数的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(2): 476-482. (WANG Chang-ming, ZHANG Xian-wei. Effect of soft clay structure on secondary consolidation coefficient[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(2): 476-482. (in Chinese))
[36]	于洪丹. Boom clay渗流—应力耦合长期力学特性研究[D]. 武汉: 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所, 2010. (YU Hong-dan. Study on long-term hydro-mechanical coupled behavior of Belgium Boom clay[D]. Wuhan: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010. (in Chinese))
[37]	NAKAI T, HINOKIO M. A simple elastoplastic model for normally and overconsolidated soils with unified materical parameters[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2004, 44(2): 53-70.