砂土中螺旋锚上拔承载特性模型试验研究

郝冬雪; 陈榕; 符胜男

doi:10.11779/CJGE201501015

砂土中螺旋锚上拔承载特性模型试验研究 English Version

东北电力大学建筑工程学院,吉林吉林 132012

基金项目: 交通部建设科技项目（2013318Q03030）; 教育部创新团队; 发展计划项目（IRT1186）

详细信息

作者简介:
郝冬雪(1981- ),女,辽宁沈阳人,博士,副教授,主要从事输电线路基础承载特性及原位测试机理研究工作。E-mail: haodongxue2005@126.com。

中图分类号: TU432
计量
- 文章访问数: 0368
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0476
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-05-11
- 发布日期: 2015-01-19

Experimental study on uplift capacity of multi-helix anchors in sand

School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northeast Dianli University; Jilin 132012, China

摘要

摘要: 螺旋锚基础因其能够利用深层土体抗力且具有快速安装和承载的优势而广泛应用于各类岩土工程问题中。多锚片螺旋锚上拔承载特性受埋深、锚片间距、数量、土质条件等因素影响。相邻锚片相互影响导致土体破坏区域重叠,从而影响破坏模式和极限承载力,然而多锚片螺旋锚承载特性的理论及试验研究有限。针对砂土中螺旋锚锚片间距及数量对上拔承载特性及极限上拔承载力影响进行室内1g模型试验研究。结果表明,在中密砂及密砂中,单锚埋深比分别超过6.0和10.5时可认为是深埋锚。中密砂中深埋多片螺旋锚锚片间距在3.0D~4.5D时,各锚片承载能力能够独立发挥,承载量破坏模式发生;密砂中浅埋多片螺旋锚保证承载量破坏模式的锚片间距超过6.0D,但间距为6.0D时,螺旋锚发挥效率超过90%。增加锚片数量可适当提高上拔承载力,但当锚片数量增加使得锚片间距小于某一临界值时,柱状破坏模式发生,螺旋锚承载力不再增加;中密砂中此临界间距约为1.5D,密砂中临界间距约为2.0D。
- 多锚片螺旋锚 /
- 上拔承载特性 /
- 临界埋深比 /
- 锚片间距 /
- 锚片数量
Abstract: Helical anchors are widely used to resist uplift loading for a variety of applications involving a wide range of soil conditions. The performance and ultimate capacity of multi-helix anchors depends on the depth of embedment, spacing and number of helixes and soil conditions. The interaction of adjacent helixes can make the overlapping of soil failure zone, which thus will affect the failure mode and ultimate uplift resistance. However, there is very limited experimental study on the problem. The behavior of multi-helix anchors in medium and dense sand is investigated by performing a series of small-scale pullout tests. The embedment ratios for deep anchors in medium and dense sand are regarded as 6 and 10.5 respectively. The critical spacing of helixes of deep anchors in medium sand that makes individual bearing capacity occur is between 3.0D and 4.5D. The critical spacing of helixes of shallow anchors in dense sand is greater than 6.0D, which can reach the efficiency of more than 90%. The uplift resistance will increase with the increasing number of helixes. However, cylindrical failure mode will happen when the spacing decreases to some value due to the increase in number of helixes, which can no longer produce higher uplift resistance. The critical values of spacing are about 1.5D and 2.0D for the medium and dense sand respectively.
- multi-helix anchor /
- uplift capacity /
- critical embedment ratio /
- spacing of helix /
- number of helix

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]	王钊, 刘祖德, 程葆田. 螺旋锚的试制和在基坑支护中的应用[J]. 土木工程学报, 1993, 26(4): 47-53. (WANG Zhao, LIU Zu-de, CHENG Bao-tian. Trial-produce of screw anchor and its application in fencing foundation pit[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 1993, 26(4): 47-53. (in Chinese))
[2]	侍倩, 刘一亮, 李翠华, 等. 螺旋锚基础在输电线路中应用的试验研究[J]. 武汉水利电力大学学报, 1998, 31(4): 29-32. (SHI Qian, LIU Yi-liang, LI Cui-hua, et al. Experimental research on application of screw anchored foundation to transmission route[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Hydraulic and Electric Engineering, 1998, 31(4): 29-32. (in Chinese))
[3]	王杰, 杜秋男, 孙海峰, 等. 砂土中螺旋锚极限抗拔承载力研究[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报, 2009, 25(1): 66-70. (WANG Jie, DU Qiu-nan, SUN Hai-feng, et al. Study on the ultimate uplift bearing capacity of screw anchor[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University, 2009, 25(1): 66-70. (in Chinese))
[4]	MERIFIELD R S. Ultimate uplift capacity of multiplate helical type anchors in clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2011, 137(7): 704-716.
[5]	Q/GDW 584—2011 架空输电线路螺旋锚基础设计技术规范[S]. 2011. (Q/GDW 584—2011 Technical regulation for design screwanchor foundation of overhead transmission line[S]. 2011. (in Chinese))
[6]	CHANCE A B. Basic guidelines for designing helical piers for underpinning[M]. 1993. www. abchance. aom.
[7]	Earth Contact Products. Utility industry anchor design and maintenance manual[M]. 2011. www. Earth contactproducts. Com.
[8]	CLEMENCE S P, CROUCH L K, STEPHENSON R W. Prediction of uplift capacity for helical anchors in sand[C]// Proceedings of the 2nd Geotechnical Conference. Cairo, 1994: 332-343
[9]	SAKR M. Performance of helical piles in oil sand[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(8): 1046-1061.
[10]	TSUHA C, AOKI N. Relationship between installation torque and uplift capacity of deep helical piles in sand[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2010, 47(5): 635-647.
[11]	LUTENEGGER A J. Behavior of multi-helix screw anchors in sand[C]// 2011 Pan-Am CGS Geotechnical Conference. Toronto, 2011.
[12]	LIU J Y, LIU M L, ZHU Z D. Sand deformation around an uplift plate anchor[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2012, 138(6): 728-737.
[13]	ANDERSEN K H, SCHJETNE K. Database of friction angles of sand and consolidation characteristics of sand, silt and clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2013, 139(7): 1140-1155.
[14]	ROWE R K, DAVIS E H. The behaviour of anchor plates in sand[J]. Géotechnique, 1982, 32(1): 25-41.
[15]	DICKIN E A. Uplift behavior of horizontal anchor plates in sand[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1988, 114(11): 1300-1317.
[16]	MURRAY E J, GEDDES J D. Uplift of anchor plates in sand[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1987, 113(3): 202-215.
[17]	DAS B M, SEELEY G R. Breakout resistance of shallow horizontal anchors[J]. Journal ofthe Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1975, 101(GT9): 999-1003.