• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

隧道分部开挖的围岩松动区演变分析

章慧健, 龚伦, 仇文革, 赵斌

章慧健, 龚伦, 仇文革, 赵斌. 隧道分部开挖的围岩松动区演变分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(12): 2323-2329. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201412022
引用本文: 章慧健, 龚伦, 仇文革, 赵斌. 隧道分部开挖的围岩松动区演变分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(12): 2323-2329. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201412022
ZHANG Hui-jian, GONG Lun, QIU Wen-ge, ZHAO Bin. Evolution of loosened zone of surrounding rock for tunnels constructed by multi-partition excavation method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(12): 2323-2329. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201412022
Citation: ZHANG Hui-jian, GONG Lun, QIU Wen-ge, ZHAO Bin. Evolution of loosened zone of surrounding rock for tunnels constructed by multi-partition excavation method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(12): 2323-2329. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201412022

隧道分部开挖的围岩松动区演变分析  English Version

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(51208437); 铁道部科技研究开发计划项目(2010G016-H); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(SWJTU12BR039)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    章慧健(1982- ),男,博士,讲师,主要从事隧道及地下工程施工过程力学行为等方面的研究。E-mail: huijianz@163.com。

Evolution of loosened zone of surrounding rock for tunnels constructed by multi-partition excavation method

  • 摘要: 以乌蒙山二号四线铁路隧道为工程背景,通过数值模拟手段对比研究分部开挖与一次成洞的松动区形态和大小差异,再结合现场测试结果,分析隧道分部开挖的松动区演变规律。结果表明:一次成洞松动区范围要普遍大于多部开挖的最终松动区范围,最大径向松动深度高出12.6%,最小径向松动深度高出41.2%;在松动区分布形态上,一次成洞表现为左右基本对称,多部开挖具有一定的不对称性,且多部开挖基本是从拱顶到边墙部位依次减小,而一次成洞则呈“拱顶>拱脚>拱肩>边墙”的分布形式。多部开挖时,先挖部分的松动区随着后续开挖部的推进有所增加,后挖部对先挖部的影响表现为:“上下关系”强于“左右关系”;另一方面,左右对称位置后挖侧松动区略大于先挖侧,说明先挖部对后挖部亦有劣化作用;其最终松动区是各开挖部相互影响和发展的结果,体现过程相关性。
    Abstract: Based on Wumengshan No. 2 railway station tunnel with four tracks, numerical simulation is performed to comparatively study the differences of loosened zone between multi-partition excavation and full face excavation. Based on the field monitoring data, the evolution of loosened zone by multi-partition excavation is analyzed. The results indicate that: from the viewpoint of thickness of loosened zone, the full face excavation makes it greater than the multi-partition excavation does, with the maximum value being 12.6% greater and the minimum value being 41.2% greater. From the viewpoint of distribution of loosened zone, the full face excavation makes it generally symmetrical, but the multi-partition excavation does not. Besides, for the multi-partition excavation, the thickness of loosened zone decreases from the crown to the side wall, but for the full face excavation, the thickness has a distribiotion of “crown > arch toe > arch shoulder > side wall”. For the multi-partition excavation case, the loosened zone near the earlier excavated part will increase owing to the later excavation of other parts. This influence of “up and down position” is greater than that of “left and right position”. Furthermore, for the left and right position, the loosened zone near the later excavated part is little greater than that near the earlier excavated part. This makes it clear that the earlier excavation has deteriorating effect on the later excavated part. The final loosened zone is the result of excavation interaction of all parts, so it is highly process-related.
  • [1] 王后裕, 陈上明, 言志信. 地下工程动态设计原理[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2008. (WANG Hou-yu, CHEN Shang-ming, YAN Zhi-xin. Dynamic design principle of underground engineering[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2008. (in Chinese))
    [2] CHEN Chee-nan, HUANG Wen-yen, TSENG Cheng-tsung. Stress redistribution and ground arch development during tunneling [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26: 228-235.
    [3] 曲海峰. 扁平特大断面公路隧道荷载模式及应用研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2007. (QU Hai-feng. Study on load mode of road tunnel with extra-large cross-section and low flat-ratio and its application[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2007. (in Chinese))
    [4] 武 军, 廖少明, 张 迪. 基于颗粒流椭球体理论的隧道极限松动区与松动土压力[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(4): 714-721. (WU Jun, LIAO Shao-ming, ZHANG Di. Loosening zone and earth pressure around tunnels in sandy soils based on ellipsoid theory of particle flows[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(4): 714-721. (in Chinese))
    [5] 陈建功, 贺 虎, 张永兴. 巷道围岩松动圈形成机理的动静力学解析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(12): 1964-1968. (CHEN Jian-gong, HE Hu, ZHANG Yong-xing. Dynamic and static analysis of mechanism of loosen zone in surrounding rock of tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(12): 80-85. (in Chinese))
    [6] HOEK E. Big tunnels in bad rock[J]. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127: 726-740.
    [7] JIANG Y, YONEDA H, TANABASHI Y. Theoretical estimation of loosening pressure on tunnels in soft rocks[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16: 99-105.
    [8] 徐干成, 白洪才, 郑颖人, 等. 地下工程支护结构[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2002. (XU Gan-cheng, BAI Hong-cai, ZHENG Ying-ren, et al. Support structure of underground engineering[M]. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2002. (in Chinese))
    [9] Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. Theory and Background: Constitutive Models [M]. FLAC 3D Manuals, 2005.
    [10] 杨永杰, 刘传孝, 蒋金泉, 等. 巷道围岩松动圈的地质雷达探测及应用[J]. 工程地质学报, 1997, 5(3): 276-281. (YANG Yong-jie, LIU Chuan-xiao, JIANG Jin-quan, et al. Fractured detection of rock zone in mine roadway with ground penetrating radar and its application[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 1997, 5(3): 276-281. (in Chinese))
    [11] 宋宏伟, 王 闯, 贾颖绚. 用地质雷达测试围岩松动圈的原理与实践[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2002, 31(4): 370-373. (SONG Hong-wei, WANG Chuang, JIA Ying-xuan. Principle of measuring broken rock zone around underground roadway with gpr and its application[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2002, 31(4): 370-373. (in Chinese))
    [12] 蔡成国, 孟照辉, 熊昌盛. 围岩松动圈地球物理方法检测[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2004(7): 87-89. (CAI Cheng-guo, MENG Zhao-hui, XIONG Chang-sheng. The geophysics methods to detection of flexible circle[J]. West- China Exploration Engineering, 2004(7): 87-89. (in Chinese))
    [13] 郭 亮, 李俊才, 张志铖, 等. 地质雷达探测偏压隧道围岩松动圈的研究与应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(增刊1): 3009-3015. (GUO Liang, LI Jun-cai, ZHANG Zhi-cheng, et al. Research on surrounding rock loose zone of tunnel under unsymmetrical loading with ground penetrating radar and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(S1): 3009-3015. (in Chinese))
  • 期刊类型引用(6)

    1. 张德沧,毛佳,戴妙林,邵琳玉,赵兰浩. 圆化离散单元法的改进及其在岩体断裂过程中的应用. 岩土工程学报. 2024(09): 1974-1983 . 本站查看
    2. 何荣兴,张智源,张星宇,章雅雯. 诱导下岩体裂隙扩展规律研究存在问题及对策. 中国矿业. 2024(10): 168-176 . 百度学术
    3. 刘洋,吴志军,储昭飞,翁磊,徐翔宇,周原,高波,毛春光. 基于FDEM的围压条件下机械冲击破岩机理研究. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 866-879 . 百度学术
    4. 杨奎斌,朱彦鹏. 考虑后缘裂缝影响的均质土坡滑动面形式及搜索研究. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2022(05): 1216-1227 . 百度学术
    5. 张亚军,莫思阳,张友良. 基于修正牛顿-拉普森迭代的数值流形法. 计算机仿真. 2022(09): 394-397+440 . 百度学术
    6. 韩笑. 基于高阶块体元-有限元建模的混凝土细观数值分析. 粉煤灰综合利用. 2021(03): 56-63 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(7)

计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 13
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-03-19
  • 发布日期:  2014-12-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回