• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

含空洞地层初始破坏的复变函数解析研究

李倩倩, 张顶立, 房倩

李倩倩, 张顶立, 房倩. 含空洞地层初始破坏的复变函数解析研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(11): 2110-2117. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201411018
引用本文: 李倩倩, 张顶立, 房倩. 含空洞地层初始破坏的复变函数解析研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(11): 2110-2117. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201411018
LI Qian-qian, ZHANG Ding-li, FANG Qian. Analytic solution to initial damage of cavern strata by complex function method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(11): 2110-2117. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201411018
Citation: LI Qian-qian, ZHANG Ding-li, FANG Qian. Analytic solution to initial damage of cavern strata by complex function method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(11): 2110-2117. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201411018

含空洞地层初始破坏的复变函数解析研究  English Version

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2010CB732102); 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(51308036); 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2012JBM081)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李倩倩(1986-),女,博士研究生,主要从隧道工程方面的研究。E-mail:11115297@bjtu.edu.cn。

Analytic solution to initial damage of cavern strata by complex function method

  • 摘要: 为分析城市浅部地层中椭圆形空洞的稳定性,采用复变函数理论求得了自重应力及竖向均布荷载作用下含隐伏椭圆形空洞地层应力场的精确解答。以莫尔-库仑剪切屈服准则及土体抗拉强度等于零为判别依据,求得洞周初始塑性区范围,分析了空洞形状及外部荷载对塑性区位态的影响。结果表明:①在自重应力场下,地层中近圆形或瘦长状椭圆空洞自身稳定性相对扁平状空洞较好;扁平状空洞以受拉破坏为主。②外部荷载作用下地层空洞破坏模式为拉-剪综合破坏,随着外部荷载的增大,剪切塑性区与受拉区贯通,并向地层深部转移,加速地层空洞的失稳破坏。③在大量分析计算的基础上给出了空洞地层的5种分区模式。空洞地层灾变事故控制的核心是空洞结构自身的稳定性,空洞地层初始破坏的分析是确定其破坏模式以及破坏区域的关键。研究结果对城市空洞地层灾变事故的预测、评估及其处理具有重要意义。
    Abstract: To analyze the stability of oval cavities in shallow strata in urban areas, taking both gravity stress and vertical uniformly distributed load into consideration, the accurate solution to the stress field of concealed oval cavity is got by means of the complex function method. Assuming that the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion and the tensile stress of soil equal zero as the discriminate rule, the scope of plastic zone is obtained. The results reveal that: (1) Under the gravity stress field, the stability of round-shaped and slender-shaped cavities is better than that of the flat-shaped ones. The failure of the flat-shaped caverns is mainly caused by tensile stress. (2) Under the action of external load, the failure mode of cavern strata is a comprehensive tensile-shear failure. With the increment of external load, the plastic zone caused by shear stress will connect with the tensile zone, which will accelerate the failure caused by cavity destabilization. (3) Five kinds of partition patterns of cavern strata are put forward based on a great number of analyses and calculations. Therefore, the stability of cavern strata becomes the core of preventing catastrophic accidents. The results are of great significance in the prediction, evaluation and handling of catastrophic accidents caused by cavity strata.
  • [1] 钱七虎. 地下工程建设安全面临的挑战与对策[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(10): 1945-1956. (QIAN Qi-hu. Challenges faced by underground projects construction safety and countermeasures[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(10): 1945-1956. (in Chinese))
    [2] 张顶立, 张成平, 侯艳娟, 等. 北京地铁施工事故案例分析[R]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2006. (ZHANG Cheng-ping, ZHANG Ding-li, HOU Yan-juan, et al. Analysis of safety accidents in Beijing subway construction[R]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2006. (in Chinese))
    [3] 张成平, 张顶立, 王梦恕, 等.浅埋暗挖隧道施工引起的地表塌陷分析及其控制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(增刊2): 3601-3607. (ZHANG Cheng-ping, ZHANG Ding-li, WANG Meng-shu, et al. Analysis of ground subsidence induced by shallow-buried tunnel construction and its control techniques[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(S2): 3601-3607. (in Chinese))
    [4] 赵明阶, 敖建华, 刘绪华, 等. 岩溶尺寸对隧道围岩稳定性影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(2): 213-217. (ZHAO Ming-jie, AO Jian-hua, LIU Xu-hua, et al. Model testing research on influence of karst cave size on stability of surrounding rockmasses during tunnel construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(2): 213-217. (in Chinese))
    [5] 杨秀竹, 雷金山, 阳军生, 等. 岩溶区地铁隧道相似模拟试验研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2009, 6(4): 40-45. (YANG Xiu-zhu, LEI Jin-shan, YANG Jun-sheng, et al. Model test on subway tunnel in karst regions[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2009, 6(4): 40-45. (in Chinese))
    [6] ABDULLA W A, GOODINGS D J. Modeling of sinkholes in weakly cemented sand[J]. Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 122(12): 998-1005.
    [7] CHARLES E A, LYAMIN A V, SLOAN S W M. Prediction of undrained sinkhole collapse[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering, 2003, 129(3): 197-205.
    [8] 莫阳春, 周晓军.达成高速铁路岩溶隧道围岩稳定性分析.[J]中国铁道科学, 2008, 29(3): 52-57. (MO Yang-chun, ZHOU Xiao-jun. Stability analysis on the surrounding rock of a karst tunnel in Da-Cheng high speed railway[J]. China Railway Science, 2008, 29(3): 52-57. (in Chinese))
    [9] 黎 斌, 范秋雁, 秦凤荣.岩溶地区溶洞顶板稳定性分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(4): 532-536. (LI Bin, FAN Qiu-yan, QIN Feng-rong. Analysis on roof stability of karst cave in karst areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(4): 532-536. (in Chinese))
    [10] BRADY B H G, BROWN E T. Rock mechanics for underground mining[M]. London: Chapman and Hall, 1993.
    [11] VAZIRI H H, JALALI J S, ISLAM R. An analytical model for stability analysis of rock layers over a circular opening[J]. Int. J. Solids Structural, 2001, 38(21): 3735-3757.
    [12] THARP T M. Mechanics of upward propagation of cover- collapse sinkholes[J]. Eng. Geol. (Amsterdam), 1999, 52(1): 23-33.
    [13] 姜德义, 任 松, 刘新荣等.岩盐溶腔顶板稳定性突变理论分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(7): 1009-1103. (JIANG De-yi, REN Song, LIU Xin-rong, et al. Stability analysis of rock salt cavern with catastrophe theory[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(7): 1009-1103. (in Chinese))
    [14] 廖丽萍, 杨万科, 王启智. 椭球形空洞地基稳定性分析[J].岩土力学, 2010, 31(增刊2): 138-148. (LIAO Li-ping, YANG Wan-ke, WANG Qi-zhi. Stability analysis of an ellipsoidal cavity in foundation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(S2): 138-148. (in Chinese))
    [15] 欧阳振华, 蔡美峰, 李长洪. 地表塌陷中隐伏土洞的形成与扩展机理研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2006(6): 16-19. (Ouyang Zhen-hua, Cai Mei-feng, Li Chang-hong. Study on formation and expansion mechanism of hidden soil cavity in ground collapse[J]. Metal Mine, 2006(6): 16-19. (in Chinese))
    [16] 陆亚平, 徐光黎, 闫天俊. 某中心场地土洞溶洞稳定性分析及治理[J]. 中国水运, 2012, 12(2): 177-179. (LU YA-ping, XU Guan-li, YAN Tian-jun. Stability analysis and control of soil cavity in a center site[J]. China Water Transport, 2012, 12(2): 177-179. (in Chinese))
    [17] 张合青, 杨国荣, 魏戈锋. 广州新白云机场土洞、溶洞的稳定性判别及其加固处理[J].地球与环境, 2005, 33(3): 36- 40. (ZHANG He-qing, YANG Guo-rong, WEI Ge-feng. Discrimination of stability of soil caves and solution caves in the process of construction of new Baiyun international airport in Guangzhou and their reinforcement[J]. Earth and Environment. 2005, 33(3): 36-40. (in Chinese))
    [18] 张顶立. 城市地下工程建设安全风险及其控制[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2012. (ZHANG Ding-li. Safety risks and corresponding control measures of urban underground engineering construction[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2012. (in Chinese))
    [19] 方企勤. 复变函数教程[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009. (FANG Qi-qin. Complex analysis[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2009. (in Chinese))
    [20] 王桂芳. 隧道计算[M]. 成都: 成都科技大学出版社, 1992. (WANG Gui-fang. Tunnel calculate[M]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Science and Technology Press, 1992. (in Chinese))
计量
  • 文章访问数:  286
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  226
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-12-03
  • 发布日期:  2014-11-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回