液化判别的双曲线模型

孙锐; 赵倩玉; 袁晓铭

doi:10.11779/CJGE201411012

液化判别的双曲线模型 English Version

中国地震局工程力学研究所地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江哈尔滨 150080

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51278472,41272357）; 中央级公益性研究所基本科研业务费专项项目（2013B10）

详细信息

作者简介:
孙锐(1977-),女,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事岩土地震工程研究。E-mail:iemsr@163.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 304
- HTML全文浏览量: 1
- PDF下载量: 349
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-03-06
- 发布日期: 2014-11-19

Hyperbolic model for estimating liquefaction potential of sand

Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China

摘要

摘要: 基于国内外液化判别方法存在的问题,提出了一个双曲线形式的液化判别新模型。采用中国大陆以往156例液化数据完成了基于标准贯入试验的新公式构造,利用近来集集和阪神地震312例液化新数据进行了检验,并与现有规范方法和Seed方法进行了对比,结果表明：提出的双曲线模型和液化判别公式对不同地震烈度、地下水位和砂层埋深均有较好的适用性;新模型弥补了现有规范Ⅶ度下浅层液化（砂层埋深小于10 m）判别偏于危险的缺欠,对Ⅷ度和Ⅸ度下浅层土液化和非液化场地的成功率比现有规范表现得更为均衡;新模型可满足临界曲线浅层内快速变化、深层时明显变缓的客观实际要求,克服了规范Ⅷ度、Ⅸ度下深层土（砂层埋深10~20 m）判别严重保守的弊端;新模型具有渐近线形式,更符合实际情况,消除了Seed方法中标准贯入临界值随土层埋深增加先递增后递减的不正常现象。
- 砂土液化 /
- 标准贯入击数 /
- 双曲线 /
- 判别公式
Abstract: A new hyperbolic model for estimating liquefaction potential of sand is proposed to solve the exiting problems in the available liquefaction discrimination methods. By collecting 156 in-situ SPT data from previously liquefied and non-liquefied sites in China, a new SPT-based formula is proposed. The reliability of the new formula is verified by 312 data collected from 1995 Kobe Earthquake and 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake. The estimated results by the new formula are compared with those by the code method and Seed method, indicating that the hyperbolic model is quite adaptable for a wide range of seismic intensities, ground water level and buried depth of sand. The new model compensates the limitation that the discriminated results of shallow sand (less than 10 m deep) tend to be risky by the code method under intensity Ⅶ. Using the new model, the success discrimination ratios of liquefied and non-liquefied sites for shallow sand under intensities Ⅷ and Ⅸ are more uniform than those by the code method. The critical discriminating curve of the new model meets the fact that its slope is large in shallow while small in deep one. The disadvantage that the discrimination of soils 10 m to 20 m in depth under intensities Ⅷ and Ⅸ is significantly conservative by the code method is corrected. The proposed model adopts asymptotic form which is closely consistent with the real condition and avoids the abnormal phenomena using the Seed method in which N_cr increases and afterward decreases with depth.
- sand liquefaction /
- blow cont of standard penetration test /
- hyperbola /
- liquefaction discrimination formula

HTML全文

参考文献(9)

[1]	黄雨, 于淼, BHATTACHARYA Subhamoy. 2011年日本东北地区太平洋近海地震地基液化灾害综述[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(5): 834-840. (HUANG Yu, YU Miao, BHATTACHARYA Subhamoy. Review on liquefaction- induced damages of soils and foundations during the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake(Japan)[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(5): 834-840 (in Chinese))
[2]	YOUD T L, IDRISS I M. Liquefaction resistance of soils :report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineering, 2001, 127(4): 297-313.
[3]	陈龙伟, 袁晓铭, 孙锐. 2011年新西兰 M w 6.3地震液化及岩土震害评述[J]. 世界地震工程, 2013, 29(3): 1-9. (CHEN Long-wei, YUAN Xiao-ming, SUN Rui. Review of liquefaction phenomena and geotechnical damage in the 2011New Zealand M w 6.3 earthquake[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 29(3): 1-9. (in Chinese))
[4]	陈国兴. 对我国六种抗震设计规范中液化判别规定的综述和建议[J]. 南京建筑工程学院学报, 1995(2): 54-61. (CHEN Guo-xing. Some opinion and proposition on the formulas of the liquefaction estimation of sandy soils in six aseismic design codes in China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Architectural and Civil Engineering Institute, 1995(2): 54-61. (in Chinese))
[5]	GB 50011—2010建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 2010. (GB 50011—2010 Code for seismic design of buildings[S]. 2010. (in Chinese))
[6]	谢君斐. 关于修改抗震规范砂土液化判别式的几点意见[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 1984, 4(2): 95-126. (XIE Jun-fei. Some comments on the formula for estimating the liquefaction of sand in revised a seismic design code[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 1984, 4(2): 95-126. (in Chinese))
[7]	王维铭. 场地液化特征研究及液化影响因素评价[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2013. (WANG Wei-ming. Study on liquefaction characteristics and liquefaction-influencing factors assessment[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2013. (in Chinese))
[8]	GB/T17742—2008 中国地震烈度表[S]. 2009. (GB/T17742—2008 The Chinese seismic intensity scale[S]. 2009. (in Chinese))
[9]	李兆焱, 汪云龙, 曹振中, 等. 我国规范液化判别方法在新疆地区适用性检验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(增刊2): 396-400. (LI Zhao-yan WANG Yun-long, CAO Zhen-zhong, et al. Feasibility of liquefaction prediction method in China's seismic code to Xinjiang region[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(S2): 396-400. (in Chinese))