Kettleman Hills填埋场三维稳定性极限上限分析

黄茂松; 王浩然; 宁兆轲

doi:10.11779/CJGE201411004

Kettleman Hills填埋场三维稳定性极限上限分析 English Version

黄茂松^1,2,
王浩然^1,2,3,
宁兆轲^1,2

1. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;
2. 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092;
3. 上海市城市建设设计研究总院,上海 200092

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）课题项目

详细信息

作者简介:
黄茂松(1965-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,从事岩土工程方面的科研和教学工作。E-mail:mshuang@tongji.edu.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 320
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 236
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-02-23
- 发布日期: 2014-11-19

Three-dimensional stability of Kettleman Hills landfill based on upper-bound limit analysis method

1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
3. Shanghai Urban Construction Design &
Research Institue, Shanghai 200092, China

摘要

摘要: 1988年3月失稳破坏的美国Kettleman Hills填埋场是一个典型的复杂“山谷”型填埋场,众多学者研究表明仅采用二维截面分析难以对该填埋场整体稳定性进行评价。目前Kettleman Hills填埋场三维稳定性分析多采用极限平衡法,但是由于极限平衡法对破坏模式没有严格的要求（如速度相容）,无法确定其所得到的解是偏于安全还是偏于危险,甚至不能确定该破坏模式是否合理。因此本文基于极限分析上限法,构造二维、拟三维及三维破坏机构进行分析,并通过与已有的文献及数值模拟结果进行对比验证方法的合理性及有效性。分析表明,二维和拟三维破坏机构类似,构建容易计算方便,适用于填埋场初步快速分析。而三维多个块体破坏机构构建复杂,计算量大,但能够反映实际填埋场的破坏情况,适用于填埋场的详细稳定性分析。
- Kettleman Hills填埋场 /
- 三维 /
- 稳定性 /
- 极限上限分析 /
- 数值模拟
Abstract: The Kettleman Hills landfill, which had a slope-stability failure in March 1988, is a typical complex ("Valley" type) landfill, and the two-dimensional analysis is difficult to evaluate its stability. At present, the limit equilibrium method is mostly adopted in the three-dimensional stability analysis of the Kettleman Hills landfill. However, since the conduction of the failure mode does not need to satisfy the strict conditions (kinematically admissible), it is unable to identify whether the results are safe or risky, and even whether the failure mode is reasonable. Thus, based on the upper-bound limit analysis method, the two-dimensional, quasi-three-dimensional and three-dimensional failure mechanisms are conducted and verified though the comparisons with the results of the existing literatures and numerical simulations. The two-dimensional and quasi-three-dimensional failure mechanisms are similar and easy to conduct, so they are convenient for rapid preliminary stability analysis of the landfill. The three-dimensional multiple-block failure mechanism is difficult to conduct and needs large computation, but it can reflect the actual destruction of the landfill and is suitable for a detailed analysis of the landfill.
- Kettleman Hills landfill /
- three-dimension /
- stability /
- upper-bound limit analysis /
- numerical simulation

HTML全文

参考文献(10)

[1]	KOERNERR M, SOONG T Y. Leachate in landfills: the stability issues[J] . Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2000, 18: 293-309.
[2]	QIAN X, KOERNER R M, GRAY D H. Translational failure analysis of landfill[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironment Engineering, ASCE, 2003, 129(6): 506-519.
[3]	钱学德, 施建勇. 关于具有多层复合衬里填埋场稳定安全的探讨[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(11): 1676-1682. (QIAN Xue-de, SHI Jian-yong. Stability problems for landfills with multilayer geosynthetic liner system[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(11): 1676-1682. (in Chinese))
[4]	冯世进, 陈云敏, 高广运. 垃圾填埋场沿底部衬垫系统破坏的稳定性分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(1): 20-25. (FEN Shi-jin, CHEN Yun-min, GAO Guang-yun. Analysis on translational failure of landfill along the underlying liner system[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(1): 20-25. (in Chinese))
[5]	SEED R B, MITCHELL J K, SEED H B. Kettleman Hills waste landfill slope failure Ⅱ: Stability analysis[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1990, 116(4): 669-690.
[6]	STARK T D, POEPPEL A R. Landfill liner interface strength from torsional-ring-shear tests[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1994, 120(3): 597-615.
[7]	CHANG M. Three-dimensional stability analysis of the Kettleman Hills landfill slope failure based on observed sliding-block mechanism[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2005, 32: 587-599.
[8]	MITCHELL J K, SEED R B, SEED H B. Kettleman Hills waste landfill slope failure Ⅰ: Liner system propeties[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1990, 116(4): 647-668.
[9]	BYRNE R J, KENDALL J, BROWN S. Cause and mechanism of failure, Kettleman Hills landfill B-19, phose IA[C]// Seed R B, Boulanger R W, ed. Stability and Performance of Slopes and Embankments Ⅱ: 1128-1215.
[10]	SINGH S, MURPHY B. Evaluation of the stability of santiary landfills[M]// LANDVA A, KNOWLES G D, eds. Geotechnics of Waste Fills: Theory and Pratice. ASTM STP1070, 1990: 240-258.