• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

考虑回淤的沉管隧道基础层压缩模型试验研究

魏纲, 裘慧杰, 杨泽飞, 王栋迪, 邢建见

魏纲, 裘慧杰, 杨泽飞, 王栋迪, 邢建见. 考虑回淤的沉管隧道基础层压缩模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(8): 1544-1552. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201408022
引用本文: 魏纲, 裘慧杰, 杨泽飞, 王栋迪, 邢建见. 考虑回淤的沉管隧道基础层压缩模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(8): 1544-1552. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201408022
WEI Gang, QIU Hui-jie, YANG Ze-fei, WANG Dong-di, XING Jian-jian. Model tests on compression of base layer of immersed tube tunnels considering siltation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(8): 1544-1552. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201408022
Citation: WEI Gang, QIU Hui-jie, YANG Ze-fei, WANG Dong-di, XING Jian-jian. Model tests on compression of base layer of immersed tube tunnels considering siltation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(8): 1544-1552. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201408022

考虑回淤的沉管隧道基础层压缩模型试验研究  English Version

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(51178428); 浙江省自然科学基金项目(LZ12E08001); 浙江省本科院校中青年学科带头人学术攀登项目(pd2013454)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    魏 纲(1977- ),男,浙江杭州人,博士,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事地下隧道施工对周边环境影响及风险评估与控制等方面的研究。E-mail: weig@zucc.edu.cn。

  • 中图分类号: TU411

Model tests on compression of base layer of immersed tube tunnels considering siltation

  • 摘要: 实测数据统计结果表明,沉管隧道施工期间的沉降占到总沉降的50%以上,而施工期间沉降主要由基础层压缩引起。以舟山沈家门港海底沉管隧道为原型,取纵向30 m建立1∶10缩尺寸模型,试验重点模拟海水环境下注砂基础层形成过程,并研究其在不同回淤条件下的整体压缩过程,评估回淤对压缩的影响。研究结果表明:无回淤条件下砂石基础层整体压缩模量为3.41 MPa,表明沉管隧道基础层的压缩性能较差;夹杂不同浓度的回淤层后,基础层整体压缩模量在1.54~3.89 MPa区间,集中在2.34 MPa附近,约为无回淤条件的0.69倍;回淤起到类似润滑剂的作用,增加了砂石的交错重叠量和垫层整体的塑性,会延长压缩稳定时间,增加基础层的压缩量,放大压缩区域的不均匀性。
    Abstract: The measured statistical results show that the settlement of immersed tube tunnels during construction accounts for more than 50% of the total one and is mainly caused by compression of the base layer. Based on the prototype of Shenjiamen Port immersed tube tunnel in Zhoushan, a 1:10 scale shrinkage model is established for the longitudinal length of 30 m focusing on the formation process of sand base layer in marine environment to study its compression process under different deposition conditions and to assess the impact of back silting. The results shows under no silt gravel, the compressibility modulus of the overall base layer is 3.41 MPa, indicatings the poor compression performance of base layer. Under different concentrations of back silting, the compressibility modulus of the base layer ranges from 1.54 to 3.89 MPa, mainly about 2.34 MPa, about 0.69 times that without back silting. The silting acts like lubricant which increases the interleave of sand and gravel, extends the compression settling time, increases the compression amount of base layer and enlarges the regional inhomogeneity.
  • [1] GRANTZ W C. Immersed tunnel settlements Part 2:case histories[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(3): 203-210.
    [2] 魏 纲, 裘慧杰, 魏新江. 沉管隧道施工期间与工后长期沉降的数据分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(增刊2): 3413-3420. (WEI Gang, QIU Hui-jie, WEI Xin-jiang. Analysis of construction and post-construction settlement data caused by immersed tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(S2): 3413-3420. (in Chinese))
    [3] 邵俊江, 李永盛. 沉管隧道沉降问题分析[J]. 浙江交通科技, 2005(2): 41-43. (SHAO Jun-jiang, LI Yong-sheng. Analysis of immersed tunnel settlement[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Transportation Science and Technology, 2005(2): 41-43. (in Chinese))
    [4] 邵俊江. 沉管隧道的沉降预测及其控制研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2003. (SHAO Jun-jiang. Study on prediction and control for settlements of immersed tunnel[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2003.(in Chinese))
    [5] 潘永仁, 彭 俊, NAOTAKE Saito. 上海外环沉管隧道管段基础压砂法施工技术[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2004, 41(1): 41-45. (PAN Yong-ren, PENG Jun, NAOTAKE Saito. Technology of sand injection for the foundation of immersed tube elements on the external ring of Shanghai[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2004, 41(1): 41-45. (in Chinese))
    [6] 黎志均. 珠江隧道工程基础灌砂模型试验[J]. 华南港工, 1996(1): 49-52. (LI Zhi-jun. Model test of sand filled foundation for under water tunnel crossing pearl river[J]. South China Harbor Engineering, 1996(1): 49-52. (in Chinese))
    [7] 黎志均. 珠江隧道工程基础灌砂试验研究[J]. 中国港湾建设, 2001(1): 18-20. (LI Zhi-jun. Study and research of sand filled foundation for under water tunnel crossing pearl river[J]. China Harbor Engineering, 2001(1): 18-20. (in Chinese))
    [8] 陈韶章, 陈 越, 张 弥. 沉管隧道设计与施工[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2002. (CHEN Shao-zhang, CHEN Yue, ZHANG Mi. Immersed tube tunnel design and construction[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2002. (in Chinese))
    [9] 郑爱元, 谭忠盛, 李治国. 沉管隧道基础灌砂模拟试验[J]. 中国工程科学, 2009(7): 81-85. (ZHENG Ai-yuan, TAN Zhong-sheng, LI Zhi-guo. Simulation experiment of pumped sand on immersed tunnel[J]. Engineering Science, 2009(7): 81-85. (in Chinese))
    [10] 吴鸿军, 李治国, 程晓明. 沉管隧道基础灌砂模拟试验[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2009(6): 155-157. (WU Hong-jun, LI Zhi-guo, CHENG Xiao-ming. Simulation experiment of pumped sand on immersed tunnel[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2009(6): 155-157. (in Chinese))
    [11] 王光辉, 李治国, 程晓明, 等. 生物岛-大学城沉管隧道灌砂试验及结果分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2009(2): 176-180. (WANG Guang-hui, LI Zhi-guo, CHENG Xiao-ming, et al. Sand flowing experiment and experiment result analysis: case study on Shengwudao-Daxuecheng immersed tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2009(2): 176-180. (in Chinese))
    [12] 袁伟耀. 变截面沉管隧道基础处理物理模拟试验研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2010. (YUAN Wei-yao. Research on variational section immersed tunnel foundation treatment model experiment[D]. Guangzhou:South China University of Technology, 2010. (in Chinese))
    [13] 莫海鸿, 房营光, 黎 伟, 等. 砂流法处理沉管隧道地基的模型试验方法[J]. 广东土木与建筑, 2011(3): 14-17. (MO Hai-hong, FANG Ying-guang, LI Wei, et al. Model test method for the foundation of immersed tunnel tube treated by sand flow method[J]. Guangdong Architecture Civil Engineering, 2011(3): 14-17. (in Chinese))
    [14] 莫海鸿, 黎 伟, 房营光, 等. 沉管隧道底板面材质对砂流法地基影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(7): 1452-1461. (MO Hai-hong, LI Wei, FANG Ying-guang, et al. Model experimental research on effect of material of immersed tunnel bottom surface on foundation formed by sand flow method[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(7): 1452-1461. (in Chinese))
    [15] 房营光, 黎 伟, 莫海鸿, 等. 沉管隧道地面砂流法处理的砂盘扩展规律试验与分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(1): 206-216. (FANG Ying-guang, LI Wei, MO Hai-hong, et al. Experiment and analysis of law of sand deposit expansion in foundation of immersed tube tunnel treated by sand flow method[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(1): 206-216. (in Chinese))
    [16] 沈永芳. 沉管隧道基础注浆效果等比例模型试验研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2012. (SHENG Yong-fang. Research on the same scale model test and evaluation of foundation grouting effect in the immersed tube tunnel[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2012. (in Chinese))
    [17] 宋光猛. 沉管隧道基础注浆效果模型试验研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2012. (SONG Guang-meng. Research on the model test and evaluation of foundation grouting effect in the immersed tube tunnel[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2012. (in Chinese))
    [18] 宁茂权. 沈家门港海底沉管隧道设计介绍[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2008, 45(6): 61-69. (NING Mao-quan. Design of shenjiamengang undersea immersed tube tunnel[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2008, 45(6): 61-69. (in Chinese))
    [19] 魏 纲, 朱昕光, 苏勤卫. 沉管隧道竖向不均匀沉降的计算方法及分布研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2013, 50(6): 58-65. (WEI Gang, ZHU Xin-guang, SU Qin-wei. Calculation and distribution of vertical differential settlement induced by immersed tunnel[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2013, 50(6): 58-65. (in Chinese))
计量
  • 文章访问数:  333
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  354
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-01-05
  • 发布日期:  2014-08-18

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回