淋滤条件下水泥固化铅污染高岭土的强度及 微观特性的研究

刘兆鹏; 杜延军; 刘松玉; 蒋宁俊; 朱晶晶

doi:10.11779/CJGE201403018

淋滤条件下水泥固化铅污染高岭土的强度及微观特性的研究 English Version

东南大学交通学院岩土工程研究所,江苏南京 210096

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51278100,41330641）; 江苏省自然科学基金项目（BK2012022,BK2010060）; 国家863计划项目（2013AA06A206）

详细信息

作者简介:
刘兆鹏(1989- )，男，硕士研究生，主要从事环境岩土工程研究。E-mail: liuzhp90@163.com。

通讯作者:
杜延军

中图分类号: TU47
计量
- 文章访问数: 0280
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0471
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-07-04
- 发布日期: 2014-03-19

Strength and microstructural characteristics of cement solidified lead-contaminated kaolin exposed to leaching circumstances

Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

摘要

摘要: 通过半动态淋滤试验,研究淋滤液初始pH=2,4,7时水泥固化铅污染土的强度、微观和钙溶出特性。无侧限抗压强度试验及钙溶出率（CFR_Ca）结果表明：半动态淋滤试验使试样无侧限抗压强度（q_u）较标准养护39 d试样降低了1%～42%；淋滤液初始pH=2时,CFR_Ca为pH=4或7时的2～7倍,而pH=4与7时q_u及CFR_Ca差别均不明显；水泥掺量由12%提高到18%时,q_u增大了35%～98%,CFR_Ca降低了40%～58%；固化铅污染土较固化未污染土,其q_u小50%～68%,而CFR_Ca大29%～175%。试样无侧限抗压强度比q_r（淋滤后试样q_u/标准养护39 d试样q_u）与CFR_Ca在双对数坐标下呈现良好线性关系：随CFR_Ca增大,q_r减小,说明钙的溶出是控制固化污染土/未污染土强度的主要因素之一。X射线衍射、扫描电镜及压汞试验结果表明,高浓度铅抑制水泥水化/火山灰反应,固化铅污染土与固化未污染土孔隙分布分别呈单峰和双峰特征,固化铅污染土中铅形成Si-O-Pb结合体、PbAl₂O₄、CaPbO₃等沉淀是铅固化稳定化的主要机理之一。
- 固化/稳定 /
- 铅 /
- 半动态淋滤 /
- 无侧限抗压强度 /
- 微观特性 /
- 溶出率
Abstract: The strength and microstructural characteristics of cement stabilized/solidified lead-contaminated kaolin clay are investigated. The leaching of calcium (Ca) is studied under the targeted leachant pH of 2, 4, and 7 via a series of semi-dynamic leaching tests. The results reveal that the unconfined compressive strength (q_u) of the stabilized/solidified soils experiencing the semi-dynamic leaching tests is 1% to 42% lower than that of the soils cured for 39 days under standard conditions (SC). The cumulative leaching fraction of Ca (CFR_Ca) at the leachant pH of 2 is 2 to 7 times greater than that at the leachant pH of 4 or 7. The difference in q_u or CFR_Ca of the soils experiencing the semi-dynamic leaching tests at the lechant pH of 4 and 7 is marginal. When the cement content increases from 12% to 18%, q_u increases by 35% to 98%; whereas CFR_Ca decreases by 40% to 58%. Furthermore, q_u of the stabilized/solidified lead-contaminated soils is 50% to 68% lower, and CFR_Ca is 29% to 175% higher than that of the stabilized/solidified clean soils. An empirical equation is proposed for predicting the loss of unconfined compressive strength (i.e., ratio of q_u obtained after leaching tests to that obtained at curing time of 39 days under standard conditions) using CFR_Ca. It is shown that the proposed method has high accuracy. The results of X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope, and mercury intrusion porosimetry analysis show that the relatively high concentration of Pb has remarkably retarded hydration/pozzolanic reactions in the stabilized/solidified lead-contaminated soils. Therefore, the strength development, leaching of Ca, and microstructural characteristics of the stabilized/solidified lead-contaminated soils differ from those of the stabilized/solidified clean soils in a notable manner.
- solidification/stabilization /
- lead /
- semi-dynamic leaching test /
- unconfined compressive strength /
- microstructural characteristic /
- cumulative leaching fraction

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	HEKAL E E, HEGAZI W S, KISHAR E A, et al. Solidification/stabilization of Ni(II) by various cement pastes[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25(1): 109-114.
[2]	ALPASLAN B, YUKSELEN M A. Remediation of lead contaminated soils by stabilization/solidification[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2002, 133(1/2/3/4): 253-263.
[3]	杜延军, 金飞, 刘松玉, 等. 重金属工业污染场地固化/稳定处理研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(1): 116-124. (DU Yan-jun, JIN Fei, LIU Song-yu, et al. Review of stabilization/solidification technique for remediation of heavy metals contaminated lands [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(1): 116-124. (in Chinese))
[4]	DU Y J, JIANG N J, SHEN S L, et al. Experimental investigation of influence of acid rain on leaching and hydraulic characteristics of cement-based solidified/stabilized lead contaminated clay[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, 225/226: 195-201.
[5]	MOON D H, DERMATAS D. An evaluation of lead leachability from stabilized/solidified soils under modified semi-dynamic leaching conditions[J]. Engineering Geology, 2006, 85(1/2): 67-74.
[6]	MOON D H, DERMATAS D, GRUBB D G. Release of arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) from quicklime-sulfate stabilized/solidified soils under diffusion-controlled conditions [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2010, 169(1/2/3/4): 259-265.
[7]	MALVIYA R, CHAUDHRY R. Leaching behavior and immobilization of heavy metals in solidified/stabilized products[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, B137(1): 207-217.
[8]	SONG F Y, GU L, ZHU N W, et al. Leaching behavior of heavy metals from sewage sludge solidified by cement-based binders[J]. Chemosphere, 2013, 92(4): 344-350.
[9]	EPA U S. Solidification/stabilization use at superfund sites[R]. Washington D C: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Technology Innovation Office, 2000.
[10]	陈蕾, 刘松玉, 杜延军, 等. 水泥固化重金属铅污染土的强度特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(12): 1898-1903. (CHEN Lei, LIU Song-yu, DU Yan-jun, et al. Unconfined compressive strength properties of cement solidified/stabilized lead-contaminated soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(12): 1898-1903. (in Chinese))
[11]	LEE D, WAITE T D, SWARBRICK G, et al. Comparison of solidification/stabilization effects of calcite between Australian and South Korean cements[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(11): 2143-2157.
[12]	MOULIN I, STONE W E E, SANZ J, et al. Lead and zinc retention during hydration of tri-calcium silicate: a study by sorption isotherms and 29Si nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy[J]. Langmuir, 1999, 15(8): 2829-2835.
[13]	杜延军, 蒋宁俊, 王乐, 等. 水泥固化锌污染高岭土强度及微观特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(11): 2114-2120. (DU Yan-jun, JIANG Ning-jun, WANG Le, et al. Strength and microstructure characteristics of cement-based solidified/stabilized zinc-contaminated kaolin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(11): 2114-2120. (in Chinese))
[14]	刘兆鹏, 杜延军, 蒋宁俊, 等. 基于半动态淋滤试验的水泥固化铅污染黏土溶出特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(12): 2212-2218. (LIU Zhao-peng, DU Yan-jun, JIANG Ning-jun, et al. Leaching properties of cement solidified lead-contaminated clay via semi-dynamic leaching testing[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(12): 2212-2218. (in Chinese))
[15]	CUISINIER O, BORGNE T L, DENEELE D, et al. Quantification of the effects of nitrates, phosphates and chlorides on soil stabilization[J]. Engineering Geology, 2011, 117(3/4): 229-235.
[16]	廖晓勇, 崇忠义, 阎秀兰, 等. 城市工业污染场地:中国环境修复领域的新课题[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(2): 784-794. (LIAO Xiao-yong, CHONG Zhong-yi, YAN Xiu-lan, et al. Urban industrial contaminated sites: a new issue in the field of environmental remediation in China[J]. Environmental Science, 2011, 32(2): 784-794. (in Chinese))
[17]	ASTM C1308-08 Standard method for accelerated leach test for diffusive release from solidified waste and a computer program to model diffusive, fractional leaching from cylindrical waste forms[S]. 2009.
[18]	SW846 EPA Method 3051A Microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludges, soils, and oils[S]. 2007.
[19]	刘松玉. 公路地基处理[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2009. (LIU Song-yu. Ground improvement in highway engineering[M]. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2009. (in Chinese))
[20]	彭容秋. 铅冶金[M]. 长沙: 中南大学出版社, 2004. (PENG Rong-qiu. Lead metallurgy[M]. Changsha: Central South University Press, 2004. (in Chinese))
[21]	MOON D H, DERMATAS D. An evaluation of lead leachability from stabilized/solidified soils under modified semi-dynamic leaching conditions[J]. Engineering Geology, 2006, 85(1/2): 67-74.
[22]	GRUBB D G, MOON D H, REILLY T, et al. Stabilization/solidification (S/S) of Pb and W contaminated soils using Type I II Portland cement, silica fume cement and cement kiln dust[J]. Global NEST Journal, 2009, 11(3): 267-282.
[23]	BENSTED J, BARNES P. Structure and performance of cements[M]. 2nd ed. U K: Taylor & Francis, 2002.
[24]	LI X, ZHANG L M. Characterization of dual-structure pore-size distribution of soil[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(2): 129-141.
[25]	李旭, 张利民, 敖国栋. 失水过程孔隙结构、孔隙比、含水率变化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(增刊1): 100-105. (LI Xu, ZHANG Li-min, AO Guo-dong. Variations of pore structure, void ratio, and water content in soil drying process[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(S1): 100-105. (in Chinese))
[26]	LI X D, POON C S, SUN H, et al. Heavy metal speciation and leaching behaviors in cement based solidified/stabilized waste materials[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2001, 82(3): 215-230.
[27]	KNOP A, VANGULCK J, HEINECK K S, et al. Compacted artificially cemented soil-acid leachate contaminant interactions: Breakthrough curves and transport parameters[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 155(1/2): 269-276.

施引文献(35)

期刊类型引用(16)

1.	加瑞，楚振兴. 地质聚合物加固软土的研究现状与进展. 硅酸盐通报. 2025(02): 490-500 . 百度学术
2.	马丽媛，李滢，陈曦. 再生微粉和矿物掺合料对水泥浆体微观结构的影响研究. 青海大学学报. 2024(01): 24-31 . 百度学术
3.	谷雷雷，张梅，邓先军，吉久发，于剑波，王盛年. 水泥复合偏高岭土稳定粉砂土力学特性试验研究. 地质与勘探. 2024(01): 148-155 . 百度学术
4.	王志良，陈玉龙，申林方，施辉盟. 偏高岭土基地聚合物对水泥固化红黏土的改善机制. 材料导报. 2024(08): 141-147 . 百度学术
5.	黎宇，胡明鉴，郑思维，王志兵. 电石渣-矿渣固化膨胀土强度及微观机制研究. 岩土力学. 2024(S1): 461-470 . 百度学术
6.	胡家宇，徐菲，钱文勋，肖怀前，葛津宇，李嘉明. 涂覆时间对聚合物水泥基钢筋涂层粘接性能的影响机理. 材料导报. 2024(17): 127-130 . 百度学术
7.	韩瑞凯，陈宇鑫，张健，李召峰，王衍升. 养护温度对赤泥基路用胶凝材料性能及微观结构的影响. 材料导报. 2024(22): 27-34 . 百度学术
8.	何俊，管家贤，吕晓龙，张驰. 纳米硅粉改良碱渣-矿渣固化淤泥的抗硫酸镁侵蚀性能. 硅酸盐通报. 2023(04): 1344-1352 . 百度学术
9.	胡鑫，孙强，晏长根，赵春虎，王少飞. 陕北烧变岩水-岩作用的劣化特性. 煤田地质与勘探. 2023(04): 76-84 . 百度学术
10.	何俊，管家贤，龙思昊. MgSO_4硅粉改良固化淤泥的渗透性能及孔隙特征. 水利水电技术(中英文). 2023(07): 218-226 . 百度学术
11.	李丽华，韩琦培，杨星，肖衡林，李文涛，黄少平. 稻壳灰-水泥固化淤泥土力学特性及微观机理研究. 土木工程学报. 2023(12): 166-176 . 百度学术
12.	王伟，刘静静，李娜，马露. 纳米SiO_2改性滨海水泥土的短龄期力学性能与微观机制. 复合材料学报. 2022(04): 1701-1714 . 百度学术
13.	黄毫春，昌郑，吴春鹏，姚嘉敏，熊勃，刘飞禹. 纤维长度与掺量对加筋水泥土直剪特性的影响研究. 施工技术(中英文). 2022(21): 54-59 . 百度学术
14.	王盛年，高新群，吴志坚，惠洪雷，张兴瑾. 水泥偏高岭土复合稳定粉砂土渗透特性试验研究. 岩土力学. 2022(11): 3003-3014 . 百度学术
15.	李晓丽，赵晓泽，申向东. 碱激发对砒砂岩地聚物水泥复合土强度及微观结构的影响机理. 农业工程学报. 2021(12): 73-81 . 百度学术
16.	徐长文，阮波. 冻融循环下纤维水泥改良风积沙NMR试验研究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2021(09): 2289-2298 . 百度学术